Re: SUGGESTIONS FOR THE EPA BROWNFIELDS '98 CONFERENCE?

["Null, Marilyn, , SAF/MIQ" <NullM@af.pentagon.mil>]

Maybe community involvement SHOULD be interesting because it is relevant to
the developer's ability to finding good sites, convincing owners to let them
be developed and structuring deals!!

mn

> ----------
> From:  Gillon, Peter[SMTP:GillonP@gtlaw.com]
> Reply To:  cpro-brownfields@igc.org
> Sent:  Friday, April 03, 1998 12:35 PM
> To:  cpro-brownfields@igc.apc.org
> Subject:  RE: SUGGESTIONS FOR THE EPA BROWNFIELDS '98 CONFERENCE?
> 
> I think that's a good idea, but bear in mind that the community
> involvement issues are not terribly interesting or relevant to the
> developer community.  The big problems are in finding good sites,
> convincing owners to let them be developed, and structuring deals.  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: KENT BENJAMIN [SMTP:BENJAMIN.KENT@epamail.epa.gov]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 1998 4:38 PM
> > To: cpro-brownfields@igc.apc.org
> > Subject: Re: SUGGESTIONS FOR THE EPA BROWNFIELDS '98 CONFERENCE?
> > 
> > Thanks for the suggestions. FYI we have decided to
> > eliminate the separate Community Involvement Track in
> > favor of incorporating relevant panels in the other tracks. 
> > This is in response to people feeling like they couldn't cross
> > the lines to other tracks, and the lack of community
> > presence among the other tracks.
> > 
> > I think that this will force all of the stakeholders to integrate,
> > mingle, interact, and hear the other's perspective. Nothing is
> > cast in stone yet but this is the working plan.
> > 
> > 
> > Kent Benjamin
> > Environmental Justice Coordinator (MC 5101)
> > Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
> > U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
> > 202-260-2822, fax 202-260-6606
>