From: | "Kathy L. Dalton" <kd@well.com> |
Date: | Tue, 4 May 1999 10:54:14 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Definition |
A quibble on the brownfields definition: Peter Strauss has suggested that part of the EPA's definition includes "an active potential for redevelopment or reuse." On the contrary the EPA definition suggests that the contamination is presenting a barrier to reuse: EPA definition verbatim: "Abandoned,idled, or under-used industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination." source: <http://www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/glossary.htm#brow> States may each provide their own definitions. In Massachusetts the legislature purposefully did *not* define the term in its new Brownfields law last summer. However, they did include oil-contaminated sites within the purview of the law. The EPA, has quite pointedly excluded oil contamination issues, at least in my experience working with the first Boston Pilot any site where the primary issue was oil contamination was excluded from consideration by the EPA staff. **** On another note I see at least one participant in introductions has followed the "romance" theme first introduced by Tony in his request for intros. Here's Bruce Klafter kindly offering matchmaking services: >Please contact me if you need an introduction to one of our public finance >>attorneys. |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: repost: Brownfield Redevelopment for Local Governments Next by Date: Brownfields/Hazardous Waste Sites and Fences | |
Prev by Thread: repost: Brownfield Redevelopment for Local Governments Next by Thread: Re: Definition |