|From:||"Marian Flum" <Marian_Flum@uml.edu>|
|Date:||Fri, 28 May 1999 15:40:11 -0700 (PDT)|
|Subject:||Re: gentrification revisited....?|
Lowell has been somewhat successful in preserving its neighborhoods. Residents have participated in a community board recommending the rebuilding of the Acre, Lowell's poorest community. This has been due to the excellent organizing efforts of a community-based organization, the Coalition for a Better Acre, which is also a community development corp. A proposal to build a Walgreen's complex/ strip mall, displacing long-standing community businesses and private housing appears to have been shot down in favor of a plan that would retain existing small businesses, create room for small businesses being moved due to the construction of a new school a few blocks away, and provide new affordable housing. Marian R. Flum Project Director Environmental J.O.B.S. in Lowell University of Massachusetts Lowell 600 Suffolk St. Fifth Floor Lowell, MA 01854 (978) 934-2534 -----Original Message----- From: M. Taylor <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> Date: Thursday, May 27, 1999 11:25 AM Subject: gentrification revisited....? >For some time there has been discussion about the plight of urban poor >when property values rise. Brownfields redevelopment adds to that >pressure when the real estate value is encumbered by remediation >costs-you have to try to develop for the highest use value-to recoop >costs. Has anyone seen this successfully resolved where the resident >community is not forced out but is able to obtain benefits from the >redevelopment? > >Michael Taylor > > > >-- >Michael B. Taylor >Vita Nuova >97 Head of Meadow >Newtown, CT 06470 >Phone: 203/270-3413 >Fax: 203/270-3422 >TaylorM@pcnet.com > > >
Prev by Date: California Brownfields Funding|
Next by Date: Re: California Brownfields Funding
Prev by Thread: gentrification revisited....?|
Next by Thread: Re: gentrification revisited....?