From: | Rebekah Buckles <reb@sna.com> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Jun 1999 11:29:39 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | RE: gentrification revisited....? |
I concur that society must find meaningful ways to allow the local poor community to not be displaced within the redevelopment of blighted areas. If equitable participation, forward movement and sustainability of these residents is to be ensured, the approach must equally require their participation through their investment. If social funds merely purchase, administer and transfer equity to local poor residents, we have provided nothing more than the equivalent of feeding them a meal. But if we as a society establish frameworks that afford these citizens equity rights in exchange for their investment, through "sweat equity" participation, work exchange, community involvement, beautification programs and the like, we are creating a framework -- a foundation of support that opens the door to opportunity by providing the tools, resources and guidance necessary for these citizens to build a future for themselves and their families. In this way we are demonstrating our honor and respect for the unique talents and contributions that these people can make to our community and society at large. With a supporting hand, we are creating a pathway for these people to grow, to aspire, to challenge, to reach and to achieve their self-sustainability -- this is their birthright. Rebekah Buckles |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: The future of corrective action Next by Date: Re: "The Economic Benefits of Open Space" | |
Prev by Thread: Re: gentrification revisited....? Next by Thread: Re: gentrification revisited....? |