From: | paula.carrell@sfsierra.sierraclub.org |
Date: | Mon, 13 Sep 1999 13:37:37 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Re[2]: Cleanup Complete at Cedar Services Site |
and furthermore, it sounds like contaminants that were once concentrated in Bemidji (which did not want or need them) are now spread all over the country -- in Michigan, in Utah (and whereever the incinerator emissions and ash end up), in Kentucky and in yet another town in Minnesota (which probably do not want or need them either) . . . epa doesn't seem to get that "There is no 'away'" for this stuff so now Bemidji is marginally cleaner, maybe, while four other locations are now dirtier this is an improvement ?? paula carrell CA ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: RE: Cleanup Complete at Cedar Services Site Author: <cpeo-brownfields@igc.org > at internet Date: 9/10/99 9:47 AM This is an interesting announcement in that EPA is claiming they have accomplished a redevelopment of a brownfield when all that has occurred is that EPA completed a routine soil removal action for $750,000. If the announcement is correct, there was no redevelopment and certainly no end user. EPA has merely left behind a vacant lot with a lot less soil. -----Original Message----- From: cpeo@cpeo.org [mailto:cpeo@cpeo.org] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 5:59 PM To: cpeo-brownfields@igc.org Subject: EPA: Cleanup Complete at Cedar Services Site | |
Prev by Date: RE: Cleanup Complete at Cedar Services Site -Reply Next by Date: help: Re-use of Concrete underground Storage tanks | |
Prev by Thread: RE: Cleanup Complete at Cedar Services Site -Reply Next by Thread: help: Re-use of Concrete underground Storage tanks |