From: | alan@teleport.com |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 1999 13:30:07 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries |
Oops, left out the word "not" from this sentence: "Can the acknowledged = environmental benefits of an artificial restraint on growth be delivered = in a manner that does [not] differentially, negatively impact low income communities and communities of color?" Changes the meaning quite a bit, = no? Alan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To read CPEO's archived Brownfields messages visit http://www.cpeo.org/lists/brownfields If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to cpeo-brownfields-subscribe@igc.topica.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _____________________________________________________________ Got a Favorite Topic to Discuss? Start a List at Topica. http://www.topica.com/t/4 | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries |