From: | jspagnol@calepa.ca.gov |
Date: | Thu, 4 Nov 1999 11:24:45 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | RE: Re[2]: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries |
Martha your point is very well taken. Talking to a fellow last night with some experience in demographics and he opined that, if you look at the median/mean ages of those arriving in California and our current sub-population of young adults, including those up to ages 35, etc., the population "boom" is already here in babies yet to be born, let alone young people continuing to arrive in California for all the right response, e.g., jobs, climate, lifestyle, etc.. . Tough issue to address but certainly relevant. A few years ago Sierra Club attempted to get into this discussion and, as I recall, was vilified for it, e.g. arrogant, elitist, etc. Trouble is, without that as part of the discussion, you always have an "unknown" which can throw projections off and muddle forecasts, projections, etc. (These are my personal opinions of course, and do not reflect the position of Cal/EPA or the Secretary, etc., etc.) Comments from others? -----Original Message----- From: brock.martha@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:brock.martha@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 10:07 AM To: cpeo-brownfields@igc.topica.com Subject: Re[2]: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries Original message from Brock.Martha@epamail.epa.gov I posted a note recently about how we mustn't overlook the impact on Smart Growth of the basic underlying premise that growth is good. The conversation on Urban Growth Boundaries is, I believe, a perfect example of this impact. How about including control on population growth as part of the solution. No, it isn't a quick fix, but we MUST deal with it. We will continue to reap what we sow. If continue to sow population growth at rates which outstrip our ability to take care of all of us, whether the issues implicated are clean air, infrastructure capable of handling our needs for clean water and sewage management, quality of life or affordable housing, there will be no solution. How we divy up limited space will continue to engender these problems and more problems than we Americans are accustomed to living with, but which many other cultures, sadly, live with every day. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To read CPEO's archived Brownfields messages visit http://www.cpeo.org/lists/brownfields If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to cpeo-brownfields-subscribe@igc.topica.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _____________________________________________________________ Got a Favorite Topic to Discuss? Start a List at Topica. http://www.topica.com/t/4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To read CPEO's archived Brownfields messages visit http://www.cpeo.org/lists/brownfields If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to cpeo-brownfields-subscribe@igc.topica.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _____________________________________________________________ Got a Favorite Topic to Discuss? Start a List at Topica. http://www.topica.com/t/4 | |
Prev by Date: Re[2]: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Oversight Hearing Problems with EPA's Brownfields RLF Program | |
Prev by Thread: Re[2]: [CPEO-BIF] Urban Growth Boundaries Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] "UB Group Proposes Regional Nonprofit Organization To Develop Brown |