2007 CPEO Brownfields List Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 7 May 2007 18:06:22 -0000
Reply: cpeo-brownfields
Subject: [CPEO-BIF] Denver, Colorado's Osage Mercado
 
[To download a formatted 1 MB .DOC version of this report with photos, click on http://www.cpeo.org/pubs/OsageMercado.doc.]


Denver's Osage Mercado
A Community Vision for a Transit-Oriented Brownfields Development
Lenny Siegel
May, 2007

On April 12, 2007 I visited the 10th and Osage Street Revitalization site in western Denver. The Mercado Coalition, which includes some of the same activists who have united to influence the Gates Rubber Development (see http://www.cpeo.org/pubs/GatesCPEO.doc), has proposed a mixed-use development on public land adjacent to the 10th and Osage light rail station. Instead of bargaining for community benefits at a developer-led site, they are pursuing a community-initiated vision. This is the type of community-led development that activists throughout the country have been proposing since they become aware of the brownfields paradigm a dozen years ago.

The 10th and Osage site consists of two parcels, totaling three acres of land on Osage Street, on either side of the 10th and Osage Station. It's just south of downtown Denver. Both parcels are largely vacant, though one is used for parking and storage and the other contains a large electrical transformer. Historically, the site was a railyard. The City and County of Denver is in the processing of taking ownership from the Regional Transportation District, operator of the light rail system.

Site sampling indicates unacceptable levels of arsenic and semivolatile organic compounds in surficial soils, presumably deposited over the years of railroad operations. The City and County of Denver has developed a plan, under Colorado's Voluntary Clean-Up Program, to excavate the contaminated soil and replace it with clean fill. Sampling shows no groundwater issues at the site.

Denver's Office of Economic Development is seeking a $200,000 Brownfields Cleanup grant from EPA to prepare the property for reuse by remediating it to residential (unrestricted) standards. It plans to invest about $240,000 of its own money in the project, too. Cleanup will not only promote redevelopment; but it will eliminate a visual blight and a festering threat to public health.

The 10th and Osage site is located in Denver's La Alma/Lincoln Park neighborhood. Most of the area is more than 80% minority, with family incomes less than half that for Denver as a whole. An unusually large number of households are headed by single mothers. Public housing projects are adjacent to the development site.

Located at the first transit stop from downtown, this is an ideal site for a transit-oriented development. The official 2006 Transit Oriented Development Strategic Plan calls for such properties to be redeveloped as "beautiful, vital and walkable neighborhoods with housing, shopping and transportation choices that generate lasting value for citizens and public and private stakeholders." That is, it's an ideal site for "smart" urban renewal, but without steps designed to protect the interests of the surrounding neighborhood's existing residents, redevelopment would be a recipe for wholesale gentrification and displacement.

Twenty years ago, long before most people knew what transit-oriented development meant, La Alma/Lincoln Park residents envisioned a permanent cultural market within the neighborhood. In 2002, when the Regional Transportation District asked the community what should be done with the vacant parcels it owns, residents resurrected the marketplace vision. The invited nearby community organizations, foundations, and others to form the Mercado Coalition, and they began researching models for the "Osage Mercado" on the revitalization site.

According to the Coalition's brochure, "The ultimate goal of the Mercado Coalition is to create a year-round market district that will encourage business entrepreneurs from low-income families, increase regional economic opportunity, create a neighborhood focal point, and foster cultural and social understanding.... Our vision crystallized as a year-round indoor market that will incubate business entrepreneurs from low-income families, increase economic opportunities, create a neighborhood focal point, and foster cultural and social understanding."

To refine that goal and build community support, the Coalition has staged periodic outdoor markets in warm weather, including cultural celebrations. But the Mercado vision calls for indoor facilities for year-round operation, and permanent facilities to enable "work-sell" operations. It explains, "A 'work-sell' environment assembles community tradesmen, cooks, artists, craftsmen, teachers, and technology to deliver locally manufactured products to any potential customer." Plans also call for the development of mixed-income housing above some of the marketplace space, and the coalition hopes the Mercado will serve as a cornerstone of neighborhood-wide revitalization that will benefit existing residents.

Both the Office of Economic Development and the Regional Transportation District appear to have endorsed the Coalition's plan. In fact, the city/county included a letter from the Mercado Coalition in its grant application to EPA. But Coalition leaders are nervous, not because any officials have questioned the community-developed plan, but because the property is extremely valuable. A market-oriented development could conceivably generate significantly greater tax revenues, at the expense of foregoing the benefits to the current neighbors.

During my visit, I explained to Coalition leaders that the city/county's promise of community involvement, in its proposal to EPA, was binding. The city/county wrote that it "is committed to collaborating with neighborhood stakeholders to ensure that the transit oriented development at 10th and Osage meets the needs or the neighborhood." I pointed out two other cities where EPA withdrew, or threatened to withdraw, its brownfields financial support from cities that had promised to work closely with affected residents, but had not carried through.

I am optimistic, therefore, that the Osage Mercado will become a reality in the not-to-distant future, creating new economic, residential, and cultural opportunities for the residents of West Denver and establishing a national model for community-led brownfields development.


--


Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
<lsiegel@cpeo.org>
http://www.cpeo.org


_______________________________________________
Brownfields mailing list
Brownfields@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] "Connecticut's Brownfield Blues"
Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] New York city schools
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] "Connecticut's Brownfield Blues"
Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] New York city schools

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index