From: | bobh@np.craigslist.org |
Date: | 6 Jun 2007 14:09:10 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] New NRC report on limitations of sediment dredging at contaminated sites |
Sediment dredging has fallen short of achieving cleanup goals at many contaminated sites WASHINGTON -- At many projects to dredge contaminated sediments from U.S. rivers and other bodies of water, it has not been demonstrated that dredging has reduced the long-term risks the sediments pose to people and wildlife, says a new report from the National Research Council. Many dredging projects have had difficulty meeting short-term goals for reducing pollution levels. Whether dredging alone can reduce long-term risks was difficult to determine at many sites because of inadequate monitoring data and other limitations, the report says. It calls on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to improve and intensify its monitoring at dredging and other projects intended to remediate contaminated sediments at the nation's Superfund sites. Dredging's ability to achieve cleanup goals depends on a site's characteristics, the report also concludes. If a particular site has one or more unfavorable conditions -- the presence of debris such as boulders or cables, for example, or bedrock lying beneath the contaminated sediment -- then dredging alone is unlikely to be sufficient. The presence or absence of such conditions should be a major consideration in deciding whether to dredge at a site, said the committee that wrote the report. Contaminated sediments can be found at the bottoms of many U.S. rivers and other water bodies near former mining, agricultural, or industrial sites. Tainted with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), heavy metals, or other toxic substances, the sediments can pose risks to people, fish, and aquatic animals. Many of these sites are slated for cleanup by EPA under federal Superfund legislation, and a minimum of 14 of them are sediment "megasites" -- sites where the cost of remediating sediments is expected to reach at least $50 million, or has already done so. Decisions about whether to dredge at these sites have proved controversial, so Congress asked the Research Council to evaluate the method's effectiveness. To inform its conclusions, the committee examined 26 dredging projects, five of them at megasites, and evaluated whether they had attained their cleanup and risk-reduction goals. For the entire article, see: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-06/tna-sdh060507.php Bob Hersh CPEO _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Second story in Omaha, Nebraska Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] NY ---Spitzer proposes Bf reforms | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Second story in Omaha, Nebraska Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] NY ---Spitzer proposes Bf reforms |