From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:36:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] [Fwd: RE: Illinois proposal for disclosure of water contamination] |
From: Walsh, William <WALSHW@pepperlaw.com> The Safe Drinking Water Act requires monitoring and reporting to the drinking water user on a quarterly basis for chemicals for which there is a drinking water standard and for certain other chemicals for which there is no drinking water standard. The information in the reports are proscribed by regulation. The required language typically lists the likely sources of the chemical involved. The report is required whether the chemicals exceed a drinking water standard or not. The reporter and monitorer pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water Act is the public drinking water supplier, not the company which may be the cause of the contamination (which may not be known until a detailed study is performed). I think that any supplier of more than 25 people is covered. I thought that public notification was typically required hazardous waste site in Illinois, but I would need to check. The question of whether any party is required to report is more complex. CERCLA requires reporting of a release of reportable quantity (an amount per unit of time) from your facility. The facility can be anywhere the chemical was spilled or deposited. The reportable quantities vary depending upon the toxicity of the chemical. Whether the reportable quantity (measure in pounds) is exceeded depends upon the concentration, the rate of groundwater movement, and size of the plume. As noted above, often it is not as obvious what company is the cause of the contamination. For example, TCE is a degreaser, it historically was used in cleaning of septic tanks. Benzene is in gasoline and is present under many parking lots. Given the common law liability from a "failure to warn," there is even a common motivation to warn. William J. Walsh Pepper Hamilton LLP 600 Fourteenth Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 220-1424 -direct (202) 220-1665 - fax walshw@pepperlaw.comThis email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic messages from us in future then please respond to the sender to this effect. -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org --- Begin Message ---[Doesn't federal law already require annual reporting of contamination (even below drinking water standards) in public water systems of a certain size? In most places, the debate seems to be over reporting contaminated groundwater plumes that threaten to pollute private wells or to enter homes as vapors, or requiring the sampling of private wells. In my view, any party aware of groundwater contamination above drinking water standards should be required to report it to the relevant agency, and that information should be actively disclosed to the impacted public as well as registered on a public available information resource, such as a web site. - Lenny] Proposed law aims to prevent another Crestwood BY NATHANIEL ZIMMER Southtown Star (IL) April 28, 2009 An increasing number of elected officials are calling for legislation that would make it harder for municipalities to get away with supplying tainted water to residents, as Crestwood has been accused of doing. Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan on Monday became the latest to add her name to the list, proposing that the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency be required to directly notify residents by mail within two weeks if "a threat of exposure to contaminated drinking water exists." In certain situations, current state law requires notification only of the owners and operators of a water supply system. Madigan's proposal does not change the existing standard for determining what constitutes a threat to health and when notification must be made, said Susan Hedman, environmental counsel in Madigan's office. State Rep. Bob Rita (D-Blue Island), who represents Crestwood, is sponsoring Madigan's proposal in the House. "The people should have some kind of notice," he said. .... For the entire article, see http://www.southtownstar.com/news/1547009,042809crestwood.article -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Illinois proposal for disclosure of water contamination Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Reporting Contamination | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Illinois proposal for disclosure of water contamination Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] [Fwd: RE: Illinois proposal for disclosure of water contamination] |