From: | "Schnapf, Lawrence" <Lawrence.Schnapf@srz.com> |
Date: | Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:58:48 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] On Food and Environmental Contamination |
The New York Times ran an article yesterday (Sunday) on e-coli contaminations issues associated with hamburger meat. the link is at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/04/health/04meat.html?_r=1. Amidst the reporting on poor inspections and oversight by the USDA, what struck me was the contractual agreements negotiated by slaughterhouses and their customers. The slaughterhouses prohibited their customers from sampling the meat for e-coli at the risk of being cut-off from further supplies! The contractual prohibitions on sampling of meat imposed by slaughterhouses should be void as a matter of public policy. How is it in the public interest to prevent supermarkets and other companies selling meat for consumption by the public to be prevented from sampling the meat to ensure it is not contaminated. This contractual arrangement should be prohibited just like landlords are not allowed to rent substandard properties or manfacturers cannot void warranties on their products. Bringing this topic back to the environmental world, these arrangements imposed by the slaughterhouses remind me of the "no look" or "no hunt" provisions common in corporate transactions where the seller prohibits the buyer from conducting environmental sampling after the closing at the risk of voiding any contractual indemnity. As you know, I have been vocally pushing for reforming the CERCLA reporting requirements so that owners of property would be required to disclose the existence of historical contamination which is not currently required to be reported. CERCLA requires reporting of releases of hazardous substances that exceed a a "Reportable Quantity" (RQs) which are expressed in quanity over a 24 hour period. When dealing with historical contamination, owners can hide behind the fact they do not know if the contamination was a "drip, drip, drip" over a decade or a single spill. This concept of the right of contracting parties to hide information that can impact the public health and welfare be it contaminated meat or contaminated drinking water simply has no place in the 21st century. Just like a person does not have a First Amendment right to yell fire in a theater, the right of privacy or the antiquated notion of "caveat emptor" should not apply when the public health is involved. Our legal system has done away with these concepts when it comes to new residential constructions and manufactured products. I see no reason or any reason why this transparency should not be applied to contamination-be it to food or drinking water. Larry -----Original Message----- From: brownfields-bounces@lists.cpeo.org [mailto:brownfields-bounces@lists.cpeo.org] On Behalf Of Lenny Siegel Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:13 PM To: Brownfields Internet Forum Subject: [CPEO-BIF] Landfill gas beneath homes, Irondequoit, New York Methane gas found beneath two Irondequoit homes Alan Morrell Rochester Democrat and Chronicle (NY) October 2, 2009 Methane gas has been found beneath two Irondequoit homes that were built on a former landfill site, and officials quickly alerted residents Thursday to address concerns. The homes are on Timrod Drive, near the Genesee River on the west side of Irondequoit. Officials from the town's engineering firm stressed that the levels were low and that the gas has been detected only underground, not in homes. An official from the Monroe County Health Department also said there was the potential for the gas to seep into homes, but not necessarily explosive levels. .... A state Supreme Court judge in Monroe County previously sided with the Lighthouse Pointe developers, but appellate judges reversed that decision earlier this year. Alan Knauf, a lawyer for the Lighthouse Pointe developers, said in a telephone interview that the testing was done to disprove the state's contention that the levels of contamination at the dump were negligible, and to protect residents. .... For the entire article, see http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20091002/NEWS01/910020359/10 02/RSS01 -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org ***************************************************************************** U.S. Treasury Circular 230 Notice: Any U.S. federal tax advice included in this communication was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal tax penalties. ***************************************************************************** NOTICE This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential information that is privileged or that constitutes attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you. ============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Landfill gas beneath homes, Irondequoit, New York Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Meth Lab Voluntary Cleanup Guidelines | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Landfill gas beneath homes, Irondequoit, New York Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Meth Lab Voluntary Cleanup Guidelines |