From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:42:04 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] Fwd: Announcing a new Community Engagement Initiative |
FYI - Here is the publicly released OSWER CEI Action Plan. Also, here is a link to the OSWER on-line discussion forum --> http://blog.epa.gov/oswerforum/ Hello, I'd like to make you aware of a new proposed Action Plan for the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response's (OSWER) Community Engagement Initiative. The Plan can be found at: www.epa.gov/oswer/engagementinitiative.htm <http://www.epa.gov/oswer/engagementinitiative.htm>. The Community Engagement Initiative (CEI) will enhance OSWER and Regional programs' engagement with local communities and stakeholders to meaningfully participate in government decisions on land cleanup, emergency response, and the management of hazardous materials and waste. I am very interested in hearing about your ideas for the Initiative. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in a memo to employees last April: "In all its programs, EPA will provide for the fullest possible public participation in decision making. This requires not only that EPA remain open and accessible to those representing all points of view, but also that EPA offices responsible for decisions take affirmative steps to solicit the view of those who will be affected by these decisions. This includes communities of color, Native Americans, people disproportionately impacted by pollution, small businesses, cities and towns working to meet their environmental responsibilities, and others who have been historically underrepresented in EPA decision making." OSWER's Community Engagement Initiative is designed to advance this powerful and unambiguous commitment. I invite you to provide input to this plan. The Action Plan is a working document that presents guiding principles, goals and areas of action to advance the Initiative. When reviewing the proposed objectives, please consider the following questions: Are there certain best practices that should be scaled-up? Are there components of guidance and policy that we should particularly evaluate? Among these actions which are the highest priority? Are there additional areas we should focus on? What are the best mechanisms to effectively communicate progress? The objectives and actions in the plan will be refined and more fully developed as we obtain feedback and input from communities and other stakeholders, local governments, tribes, states, and EPA program offices. I look forward to hearing from you about your ideas for meaningful and effective community engagement. Please provide any comments or ideas at EPA's Web site www.epa.gov/oswer/engagementinitiative.htm <http://www.epa.gov/oswer/engagementinitiative.htm>. Comments would be most helpful if received by January 15, 2010. Sincerely, Mathy Stanislaus Assistant Administrator for EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] [Fwd: RE: EPA summary of "State Brownfields and Voluntary Response Programs"] Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Brick refractory, Mexico, Missouri | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-BIF] [Fwd: RE: EPA summary of "State Brownfields and Voluntary Response Programs"] Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Brick refractory, Mexico, Missouri |