From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:42:08 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] "Does New York need a better brownfield program?" |
Does New York need a better brownfield program? Opinion by Jeremy Moule Rochester City Newspaper (NY) February 8, 2011When a government or developer cleans up and reuses a polluted or abandoned industrial site, it can have a profoundly positive effect on the neighboring communities. Brownfield redevelopment isn't just a matter of removing contamination or ridding a site of unsightly debris, equipment, or buildings. Done right, the projects pull neighbors together and get them involved in the planning, both for remediation and future reuse. That's why it's frustrating to see the major flaws in New York's brownfield programs going unaddressed. They've been highlighted recently in a couple of reports, one an article from the Albany Times Union and the other an analysis by Environmental Advocates of New York. ... For the entire column, see http://www.rochestercitynewspaper.com/news/blog/2011/02/Does-New-York-need-a-better-brownfield-program/ -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] New York's Brownfields tax credits Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] San Diego, California - "Where Old Pollution Stunts New Development" | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Old prison property, Chillicothe, Missouri Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] San Diego, California - "Where Old Pollution Stunts New Development" |