Re: [CPEO-BIF] New Jersey vapor intrusion guidance

[bill_wolfe@comcast.net]

Lenny - One can't understand the effect of the VI Guidance without this memo - it rescinds prior policy that concluded that because the 2005 VI Guidance was incorporated  by reference in rules, it was a technical requirement. That's why I posted both PEER release and the DEP memo:

 âVarying from a Rule and Applying Technical Guidanceâ 

http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/srra/training/matrix/important_messages/variance_and_bpj.pdf

---

From: "Lenny Siegel" <LSiegel@cpeo.org>
To: "Brownfields Internet Forum" <brownfields@lists.cpeo.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 8:11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [CPEO-BIF] New Jersey vapor intrusion guidance

See Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility's critique at  
http://www.peer.org/news/print_detail.php?row_id=1545

LS
On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Lenny Siegel wrote:

> New Jersey released version 2.0 of its vapor intrusion guidance  
> this month. See  http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/guidance/vaporintrusion/
> vig_main.pdf.
>
> Lenny
>
> --
>
> Lenny Siegel
> Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
> a project of the Pacific Studies Center
> 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
> Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
> Fax: 650/961-8918
> <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
> http://www.cpeo.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Brownfields mailing list
> Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org
> http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org

--

Lenny Siegel
Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
a project of the Pacific Studies Center
278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
<lsiegel@cpeo.org>
http://www.cpeo.org

_______________________________________________
Brownfields mailing list
Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org
http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org