From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 20 Apr 2005 15:43:28 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Air National Guard |
The two articles (linked again below) that I posted on the potential closure of Air National Guard installations highlight an issue I've been following ever since the Air Force proposed to relocate the Air National Guard unit based at my "home base," Moffett Field, in 1995. Air National Guard Units are typically collocated with civilian aviation operations, such as commercial airports. I don't know whether it's by law or by policy, but Air National Guard units are based in the states which command them. They may train in other states, but the Indiana Air National Guard, for example, is based in Indiana, not Illinois. I expect the Air Force to propose to move a large number of Air Guard units to active Air Force Bases within the same states because it is generally inefficient for the Air Force to operate underutilized airfields and Air Guard bases in the same region. The impact could be significant, because each Air Guard base is not only home to week-end air warriors, but to hundreds or more active duty personnel and/or civilian Defense Department employees. Depending upon the level of activities at the host airport, the local community and/or business interests could view the impact of relocation as either positive or negative. For example, at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport, the City of Chicago viewed the Air Guard/Air Reserve facility as an encumbrance. As one of the world's busiest airports, O'Hare in the 1990s wanted more space for commercial operation. Chicago actually paid for replacement facilities at Scott Air Force Base, to which the O'Hare based military unit moved, in exchange for the O'Hare property. On the other hand, the Ft. Wayne article suggests that the potential departure of the Air Guard from the Ft. Wayne International Airport could prompt curtailing of 24-hour operations, thus undermining the viability of a commercial air cargo business, in turn putting a large share of the airport's operating revenues at risk. It's not clear, as the Air Force considers the budgetary cost of consolidation, that it will weigh whether relocation will help or harm civilian flight operations at host airports. States, which are fighting hard against base closures in general, are likely to remain neutral toward proposals to relocate Air Guard units, because they will invariably relocate within the same state. Should the impact on commercial aviation be a major factor, along with national security and Air Force operational budgets, in decisions about the future location of Air National Guard units? Lenny Siegel For the recent articles, see http://www.in-forum.com/articles/index.cfm?id=89246§ion=News http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/fortwayne/news/local/11418400.htm -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Housing privatization Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] CRS says BRAC applies to Guard bases | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Housing privatization Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] CRS says BRAC applies to Guard bases |