From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 16 May 2005 18:51:46 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Cleanup to current use |
Buried in the Pentagon's BRAC 2005 report, in a brief section describing the Defense Department's environmental responsibilities, the authors made a word choice that I hope is a mistake, but I fear is a hint of future policy. The text discusses the objective, "the remediation to current use standards may be completed after transfer." This seems to imply that the military will take responsibility for cleaning up contamination only to support continuation of currents uses on a parcel of property. For example, if the military has used an area for industrial activity, it seems to be saying that it will only clean it up to standards based upon industrial land use scenarios. Current government policy is to clean property to its "reasonably anticipated future land use," so if the local community were to designate the property for residential use, then the military would be responsible for ensuring that there is sufficient remediation to support such a use. The following text, from which the above quote was taken, may be found by going to http://www.defenselink.mil/brac/vol_I_parts_1_and_2.html and downloading Chapter 4 as a PDF file.. It's on page 30 of the overall document. *** Realigning and Closing Bases: Environmental Responsibilities The Department intends to transfer BRAC property expeditiously for reuse. However, the Department will comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires all Federal agencies to identify and consider possible environmental impacts of proposed reuse activities before transferring any real property. This analysis will also include the potential impacts on historical and cultural resources. While NEPA does not apply to the BRAC decisions themselves, the Act does require an environmental analysis for each installation receiving additional functions. Any mitigation that may be required will be identified and considered for implementation. The Military Departments are responsible for environmental remediation of closing installations. Early in the implementation process, the Military Departments will assess and document the environmental condition of all transferable property in terms of the extent of contamination and the current phase of any remedial or corrective action. If no remedial action on the installation is required, surplus real estate may be transferred. If remediation is required, the Military Department may complete the work before the transfer, or alternatively, with agreement from the affected community, the remediation to current use standards may be completed after transfer. Some property transfer negotiations have the new owner managing cleanup as a part of the redevelopment process. With regulatory concurrence, remediation and redevelopment activities may be integrated, potentially saving time and money. An ideal candidate for this type of transfer is property that has manageable environmental contamination, is readily marketable, and has community and regulator support. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Communities react to the Pentagon's BRAC proposal Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] BRAC and encroachment | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Communities react to the Pentagon's BRAC proposal Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] BRAC and encroachment |