2005 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 6 Jun 2005 16:36:53 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (ME) cleanup costs
 
Base advocates: Cleanup costs may be key flaw in BRAC logic

By BART JANSEN
Portland Press Herald (ME)
June 6, 2005

KITTERY - Lawmakers and advocates trying to prevent closure of the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard contend that the Defense Department's projected savings from the move fail to account for cleanup costs. Those costs, they say, could be extensive at a yard that has operated for two centuries and specializes in nuclear submarines.

The cleanup question is one of the biggest in Maine's challenge of the costs and savings associated with the Pentagon's recommendation to close the yard and take away its 4,510 jobs. The dispute is also central to the fight between Congress and the Defense Department about how much documentation must be released on how decisions were made to close 33 bases and reduce the size of 29 others.

...

For the entire article, see
http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/050606bracanalysis.shtml#nugget


-- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 http://www.cpeo.org

_______________________________________________
Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list
Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] "Early" transfer considered at Ft. Ord (CA)
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Aurora revives
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] "Early" transfer considered at Ft. Ord (CA)
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Aurora revives

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index