From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 6 Jun 2005 16:36:53 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (ME) cleanup costs |
Base advocates: Cleanup costs may be key flaw in BRAC logicBy BART JANSEN Portland Press Herald (ME) June 6, 2005 KITTERY - Lawmakers and advocates trying to prevent closure of the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard contend that the Defense Department's projected savings from the move fail to account for cleanup costs. Those costs, they say, could be extensive at a yard that has operated for two centuries and specializes in nuclear submarines. The cleanup question is one of the biggest in Maine's challenge of the costs and savings associated with the Pentagon's recommendation to close the yard and take away its 4,510 jobs. The dispute is also central to the fight between Congress and the Defense Department about how much documentation must be released on how decisions were made to close 33 bases and reduce the size of 29 others. ... For the entire article, see http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/050606bracanalysis.shtml#nugget
_______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] "Early" transfer considered at Ft. Ord (CA) Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Aurora revives | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] "Early" transfer considered at Ft. Ord (CA) Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Aurora revives |