From: | "lsiegel@cpeo.org" <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 9 Jun 2005 17:56:34 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Navy view of radiation |
Navy: No Need To Worry About Radiation At U.S. Submarine Base There is no radiological contamination that has had an adverse impact on the environment or the health and safety of the general public, and this has been well proven Column by Admiral MARK W. KENNY New London Day (CT) June 8, 2005 Some aspects The Day's front-page article titled, ?Radiation questions remain a concern at Submarine Base,? published June 2, require comment, including the headline. There is no concern at the Submarine Base for radioactivity associated with nuclear-powered submarines. The Navy's practices for controlling radioactivity have always met or exceeded any federal standard. The releases of low levels of radioactivity to the river in the late 1950s and 1960s were small by national and international standards, and were not large even compared to other nuclear programs today. The Navy took action in the late 1960s toward eliminating such releases, even though this was not required by federal regulation. Thus, while it is true that the Navy's practices in the first 15 years of the nuclear Navy were not as strict as the Navy's own very strict practices for the subsequent 35 years, they were not ?weak by today's standards. ... For the entire column, see http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=2945e9b7-d69c-4cab-b4e1-5358fc c3b876 -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Grone says BRAC positive Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Kittery (ME) looks ahead | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Grone says BRAC positive Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Kittery (ME) looks ahead |