From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 23 Jul 2005 00:04:30 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Navy defense Groton cleanup estimate |
U.S. Navy Cleanup Cost Estimate On Target Rear Admiral Mark W. Kenny Letters To The Editor: New London Day (CT) July 22, 2005 I am writing to explain the basis for the cost estimate to support the radiological release of Sub Base New London for unrestricted future use, should it be closed under the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Commission. An article in The Day titled ?McCarthy: Navy's cost estimate for sub base cleanup far too low,? published July 7, quoted the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection testimony stating ?major costs underestimated by the Navy include . . . dealing with radiological equipment used in conjunction with nuclear-powered submarines. The Navy calculated this cost at $9.95 million, while the state says the cost would be $31.5 million.? The article also states, ?The written testimony also notes the Navy's estimate makes no mention of how much it would cost to remediate radiological contamination at the base.? These statements are inaccurate. ... For the entire letter, see http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=59867800-16B7-40AB-9005-F55FCCE274F7 -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Veto threat over proposed BRAC delay Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Air Guard to come up with plan | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Veto threat over proposed BRAC delay Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Air Guard to come up with plan |