2006 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 14 Mar 2006 06:00:07 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] Ft. Monroe (VA) reuse planning
 
Future of fort remains on hold
Some Richmond lawmakers wonder why they should let Hampton lead plans to redevelop Fort Monroe.


BY KIMBALL PAYNE
Newport News Daily Press (VA)
March 11 2006

HAMPTON -- Fort Monroe will have to wait until next year.

Major questions still loom over the beachfront Army post that is slated for closure, and much of the state debate over the future is leaving town as lawmakers pack up this weekend in Richmond.

...

The Army isn't expected to leave until 2011, but residents, lawmakers and developers have been talking about how to reshape the fort since it was officially tabbed for closure last fall.

Plotting the future is uniquely difficult at Monroe because the post is littered with unexploded ordnance and historic buildings, has decaying flood protections and is entangled in shadowy deeds that make it unclear who is going to be in charge of the next step.

...

For the entire article, see
http://www.dailypress.com/news/local/dp-85203sy0mar11,0,4594208.story?coll=dp-news-local-final

--
Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
http://www.cpeo.org
_______________________________________________
Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list
Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] San Diego Broadway Complex (CA) secrecy
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Baltimore and Maryland's BRAC-related growth
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] San Diego Broadway Complex (CA) secrecy
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Baltimore and Maryland's BRAC-related growth

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index