From: | Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@igc.org> |
Date: | Mon, 24 Oct 1994 16:24:33 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Environmental Technology |
Via the Sierra Club FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1994 WATER WEEDS: EXPERIMENTAL CLEANUP TOOL How to get rid of soil contamination from trinitrotoluene (TNT) wastes at old munitions sites? Weed it out. That's the promising technique being tested by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD). The experimental process developed by scientists from ORD's Athens (Ga.) Environmental Research Laboratory uses common pond weeds to transform TNT in contaminated soil into non-hazardous materials through enzyme reactions. With support from the interagency Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (whose participants include the Departments of Defense and Energy, and EPA), ORD has moved the process on a fast track from bench study to pilot-scale field research. The plants, which include stonewort, hornwort, and parrot feather, contain enzymes called nitro-reductase that react with the nitro group on the TNT molecule. After these enzymes break the compound down into triaminotoluene, another enzyme called laccase oxidizes the triaminotoluene rapidly into biodegradable materials. In a scaled-up pilot study, researchers created an artificial pond containing contaminated soil, and added parrot feather to the water. In-situ remediation at a hazardous waste site would involve the same process on a larger scale. In the pilot, the treatment successfully reduced saturated TNT levels in the water from 128 parts per million (the water solubility of TNT under the conditions of the test) to below the limit at which the compound is detectable (10 parts per billion) in about three days. To identify the right plants for the job, the researchers used a simple test called an immuno-specific assay. They mashed different types of common aquatic plants, extracted liquid from each sample, and added the individual extracts to a clear solution containing an antibody that reacts chemically with nitro-reductase. The researchers were able to determine which extracts contained the enzyme by seeing which ones turned the solution blue. An EPA patent is pending on the cleanup process, and other scientists are pursuing further research to apply the technique to treatment of chlorinated solvents and other organic pollutants. (For further information, contact Lee Wolfe, Research Chemist, Athens Environmental Research Laboratory, ORD, (706)546-3429.) ENERGY-EFFICIENCY SEEN IN POSSIBLE CFC ALTERNATIVES In Europe, some refrigerator manufacturers have begun to use hydrocarbon mixtures as coolants to replace chlorofluorocarbons, which have been linked with stratospheric ozone depletion. In the U.S., interest is growing but manufacturers and consumers have questions: Do these mixtures perform well? Do they pose concerns about flammability? As part of its ongoing research on potential CFC alternatives (EPA Science Notes, April 1992), ORD's Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory is addressing these questions. In recent tests, scientists found that two mixtures of isobutane and propane in refrigerators cooled just as well as the widely used chlorofluorocarbon CFC-12, and consumed 3 percent less energy. The mixtures contained, respectively, 60 percent isobutane and 40 percent propane, and 70 percent isobutane and 30 percent propane. The laboratory also is assessing whether, with the addition of flame- suppressing fluoroiodocarbons, the mixtures become less flammable with no reduction in performance. This research is continuing. (For further information, contact Evelyn Baskin, Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, ORD, (919)541-2429.) MEETINGS November 7-10: Second Annual Health Effects Research Laboratory Symposium: Chemical Mixtures and Quantitative Risk Assessment, Research Triangle Park, N.C. (Contact: RSD Conference Coordinator, Health Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Drop 70, Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711.) |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: Re: Employment and Training Next by Date: Re: Re: Cpro discussion re: 60 Minutes | |
Prev by Thread: Mona Ellerbrock Intro to Conference Next by Thread: Re: Environmental Technology |