From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Sun, 11 Dec 1994 14:11:39 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: BASE CLOSURE: Pease Ruling |
Currently, the Superfund law - which covers many sites not on the "Superfund" National Priorities List - is supposed to prevent the transfer of contaminated Federal property to non-Federal entities, unless, as in the case of groundwater contamination, the remedy is in place and reuse and cleanup don't interfer with each other. At some sites, such as Pease, the armed service has sought to evade that restriction by making property available on a long-term lease. The receiver of the property has effective ownership, but cleanup has not taken place. Thus judge said the a long-term lease is equivalent to a transfer by deed, so uncleaned property should not be leased (long-term). It's more complicated, but that's the essence, I think. If you ask a lawyer, you'll get a much more complicated, tentative response. Lenny | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Net access on Maui Next by Date: Panama Bases-Request for Advice | |
Prev by Thread: Re: BASE CLOSURE: Pease Ruling Next by Thread: Net access on Maui |