From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Jan 1995 15:46:17 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | MARCH AFB CLEANUP STAFF ISSUE |
MARCH AIR FORCE BASE TRANSITION Members of the Restoration Advisory Board at March Air Force Base, in Riverside California, have flagged a problem which, if it recurs elsewhere, could slow cleanup at closing bases. Technically, March AFB is a "realignment," with reserve units replacing active Air Force. However, so much of its activity is being eliminated that most people consider it a "closure." Specifically, as part of the realignment, the entire environmental staff is being laid off. RAB members feel that the change will severely undermine what they consider an exemplary cleanup program. They are concerned that the replacement staff will lack the experience and site knowledge; that it will consist of people with construction, not environmental management skills; and that there will be a gap in activity when the old staff is terminated and the new staff is either not on board or merely not up to speed. I raised this issue at the January 11, 1995 meeting of the California Base Closure Environmental Advisory Committee, and the Air Force confirmed that its general policy is to re-staff closing facilities. That is, when the operating command leaves, its employees go too. The Air Force Base Conversion Agency brings in replacements to carry out continuing programs such as cleanup. However, at all other closing Air Force bases in California, the Air Force has "hired" the remedial project manager (RPM) from the operating command to serve as the closure RPM. The Air Force representative said that the transition problem at March AFB was unique. Indeed, the RPM there has challenged the Base Conversion Agency over cleanup policy. In fact, some RAB members have taken the RPM's side in a debate over the choice of contracting service centers. Air Force policy currently requires closing bases to work through the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE). The March AFB RPM and his supporters on the RAB contend that AFCEE tends to delay activity. They want the flexibility, as active bases have, to call upon other contracting agents, such as the Army Corps of Engineers. Lenny Siegel | |
Prev by Date: Re: Response to the letter to Dep. Sec. Deutch. Next by Date: Pollution News #158 | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Response to the letter to Dep. Sec. Deutch. Next by Thread: Pollution News #158 |