From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 26 May 1995 20:50:52 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | GRUMBLY ON D.O.E. E.M. CUTS |
ENERGY DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS CUT DEEPLY I usually focus on Defense Department environmental issues, but the Energy Department's environmental program just suffered a huge cut at the hands of the House National Security Committee, too. Please note that the Environmental Management program includes much more than cleanup. It's responsible for protecting plutonium stockpiles, for example. On May 25, 1995, Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management Tom Grumbly issued the following statement: "The Department of Energy is concerned with the cuts of nearly $750 million taken by the House National Security Committee from its Environmental Management budget. We are concerned about cuts directed to specific program areas, particularly in the high risk nuclear materials program. In light of the serious health, environmental, and safety problems posed by the former nuclear weapons complex, these cuts, which amount to about half of the Committee's reductions for the Department's weapons cleanup program, are significant and will have a substantial impact on program results. The other half were uncosted balances. The belief that uncosted obligations is 'free money' or a 'slush fund' is not true. These funds are the result of prudent accounting, resulting from withholding contractor funds until actions are completed, or scheduling slippage to obtain permits. We have already reduced our uncosted obligations and our current balances are $500 million less than previous years. Cutting our budget on the assumption that these uncosted balances are 'available' is borrowing from 'Peter to pay Paul.' "If finally enacted, the impacts will be felt around the country through delays in cleanup actions and in additional reductions in the work force. We will continue to stand by the President's budget, which supports the most analytically defensible program, and will work with the Congress to address these concerns." Lenny Siegel | |
Prev by Date: BAY AREA FORUM ON NATIONAL LABS Next by Date: UNOBLIGATED BALANCES | |
Prev by Thread: BAY AREA FORUM ON NATIONAL LABS Next by Thread: UNOBLIGATED BALANCES |