From: | Nick Morgan <nmorgan@igc.org> |
Date: | 22 Nov 1995 17:23:51 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | FOIA Lawsuit: Env Impact of Ft Huachuca Expansion |
Posting from "Nick Morgan" <nmorgan@igc.org> Subject: FOIA Lawsuit: Env Impact of Ft Huachuca Expansion Posting from silver@indirect.com (Robin Silver) Subject: fight for San Pedro continues Southwest Center for Biological Diversity News Release, November 20, 1995 Quest to End BRAC Cover-up Continues Lawsuit filed against DoD, Army for BRAC '95 info A lawsuit has been filed by the Southwest Center for Biological Diversity (SWCBD) in U.S. Federal District Court against the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the U.S. Army for violating the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The lawsuit resulted because DoD and the Army refuse to supply information to the public as required by law. On March 1, 1995, under FOIA law, SWCBD asked the DoD and the Army to provide all documentation, concerning the increasing effects of expanding Ft. Huachuca on the pumping of ground water from the San Pedro River aquifer, used by the Secretary of Defense and submitted to the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission to make the decision to continue the expansion of Ft. Huachuca. The latest San Pedro River hydrological data reveals that there has been an approximately 67% decrease in the low flows of the San Pedro River from 1943 through 1992. The low flows in the San Pedro River are now approximately one cubic foot per second. Decreasing flows are directly related to excess ground water pumping from Ft. Huachuca and its dependent population locally. A similar information request made on July 20, 1994, for information supplied to the BRAC '91 and BRAC '93 Commissions, revealed that DoD and the Army had covered-up the deleterious effects of the base's expansion on the San Pedro River from the BRAC Commissions during both 1991 and 1993. In fact, the Army and the DOD submitted no information to the BRAC Commissions in 1991 or 1993 to inform either Commission that the base is a serious threat to the San Pedro. The pattern of violations of law by the DoD and the Army in order to avoid an admission of Ft. Huachuca's continuing and increasingly destructive effects on the San Pedro continues. Recently, on August 30, 1995, the U.S. Federal District Court recognized such similarly inappropriate and unlawful behavior by DoD and the Army: "...This Court is convinced that the Defendants' cumulative impact analysis was incomplete, as a matter of law. The pertinent regulations explicitly require that the effects of growth generated by an agency action be contemplated and that potential impacts be discussed in relation to their magnitude. It is hard to imagine anything more obvious than the impact of Sierra Vista's continued growth on the nearby San Pedro River and the federally protected and managed Riparian Area and species there. This Court finds that the Army's FSEIS fails to satisfy the requirements of the NEPA as it fails to supply cumulative impact analysis on the River, the Riparian Area, and the associated ecosystem. The uniqueness and close proximity of the River and the Riparian Area and the magnitude of the possible impact mandates a more comprehensive and detailed investigation which the Army has failed to perform despite the fact that regulation requires environmental impacts to be discussed in proportion to their significance. 40 C.F.R. Section 1502.2 (b). Failure to address these major areas frustrates the intent of NEPA to promote informed decision making. In reaching this determination, the Court is not substituting its own judgment for that of an agency, but limiting its review to an observance that the agency has failed to consider the environmental consequences of its action. Adler v. Lewis, 675 F.2d 1085, 1096 (9th Cir. 1982). [MEMORANDUM OPINION, Alfredo C. Marquez, Southwest Center for Biological Diversity, et al., v. William J. Perry, et al., CIV 94-598 TUC ACM, August 30, 1995] For info: Kieran Suckling, SWCBD Director, (520) 733 1391 Robin Silver, M.D., SWCBD Conservation Chairman, (602) 246 4170 Jay Tutchton, Esq., Earthlaw, (303) 871 6985 | |
Prev by Date: DOD WANTS WEAKER PCB RULES Next by Date: Re: CLEANUP REFORM | |
Prev by Thread: DOD WANTS WEAKER PCB RULES Next by Thread: Istook Amendment Dead...For Now |