From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 31 May 1996 10:20:21 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | DOD & NATIVE AMERICANS |
From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> DEFENSE AND NATIVE AMERICANS The RAND Corporation recently published a brief but comprehensive review of the obligations of the Department of Defense (DoD), its components, and installations to Native Americans, including Native Alaskans and Native Hawaiians. Scrupulously documented, "Native American Affairs and the Department of Defense," is written for a military audience, but it should prove instructive to all stakeholders. The RAND report explains the statutory and administrative requirements that govern Defense Department relations with Native Americans, their environment, and their cultural heritage. It also argues that there are additional sound policy reasons for the military to respond to Indian needs, including the Army's history in forcing Indians onto reservations and the disproportionately high numbers of Indians who served in the armed forces in Vietnam, Korea, and World War II. Furthermore, the report explains that while many of the legal obligations toward indigenous Americans only apply to federally recognized Indian tribes, including Native Alaskan villages, some of the legal obligations - and the moral obligations - apply to other groups, including what I believe to be the largest single group of Native Americans, Native Hawaiians. The authors recommend five actions to implement President Clinton's April 29, 1994 memorandum directing federal agencies to work on a government-to-government level with federally recognized Native tribes: 1. "DoD and the services should develop a written policy to guide DoD installation commanders' and land managers' implementation of the President's April 29, 1994 memorandum. In particular, the policy should instruct DoD installation commanders and land managers to inform the leaders of local federally recognized tribes of their commitment to work with such tribes on a 'government-to- government' basis. The policy should recognize that some non- federally recognized tribes should receive the same commitment." 2. "To begin developing capabilities for determining which nonrecognized tribes have valid claims, histories and maps of prior Native American use of DoD agency-administered land should be made available. Such maps and histories should also be useful in preparing for consultations with recognized tribes and in implementing relevant statutes." 3. "DoD installations should designate a coordinator for Native American affairs to help retain institutional memory and policy expertise. Currently, installations typically rely on the staff archaeologist, who may not probe into the policy aspects of Native American affairs." 4. "DoD should communicate its intention to develop and implement the policies described in the first two [items] above in a highly visible and politically symbolic manner...." 5. "In consultation with federally recognized Indian tribes and other appropriate Native American groups, the Army historian or a panel of military historians should develop materials that will enable DoD personnel to understand and respond to questions from both the Native American community and the public regarding the army's historical role in implementing Congress' 18th and 19th century Indian policies." "Native American Affairs and the Department of Defense," (MR-630- OSD) by Donald Mitchell and David Rubenson, may be ordered from the RAND Corporation Distribution Services: 310/451-7002; fax: 310/451-6915; Internet: order@rand.org. Lenny Siegel | |
Prev by Date: ROCKETS AND OZONE DEPLETION Next by Date: WITNESS TAMPERING AT TOOELE? | |
Prev by Thread: ROCKETS AND OZONE DEPLETION Next by Thread: WITNESS TAMPERING AT TOOELE? |