From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 07 Jun 1996 09:06:54 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | NON-DESTRUCTIVE IMAGING |
From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> NON-DESTRUCTIVE IMAGING At a tour of Air Force bases earlier this week, I learned that the principal reason that aircraft are depainted and repainted during depot-level maintenance is to inspect for corrosion and other damage. While the Air Force is making great strides in finding less toxic ways to remove paint and using less hazardous paints, much of this activity may actually be unnecessary. On aircraft parts, the Air Force uses non-destructive imaging, such as X-ray scanning, to detect flaws in metal, and at McClellan Air Force Base in California it has a non-destructive imaging facility capable of scanning fighter aircraft as large as the F-111. I would be interested in hearing from people who might know the answers to the following questions: 1) Can non-destructive imaging be used to eliminate or at least reduce the need for routine depainting of aircraft? 2) Can the technology be scaled up to handle larger aircraft? 3) Does the commercial airline industry have a similar need? If the answers to all three questions is yes, then it might make sense for the Air Force and the private sector to team up to build a dual use imaging facility. A logical place would be McClellan, which already has the technology, if the administration moves ahead with its scheme for privatization in place. Lenny Siegel | |
Prev by Date: Tooele Community Cancer Study Next by Date: LOCKHEED MARTIN ENVIRONMENTAL | |
Prev by Thread: Tooele Community Cancer Study Next by Thread: LOCKHEED MARTIN ENVIRONMENTAL |