From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:40:22 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | MICHIGAN A.G. ON 120 H 3 |
From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL WANTS TO PRESERVE CERCLA 120 (h) (3) Michigan Attorney General Frank Kelley has written a letter opposing the proposed "Dirty Transfer" change in CERCLA 120 (h) (3). This excerpt points out some of the key, practical issues raised by the proposed legislation: "In many instances, the initial transferee of federal facilities may be a state or local government which accepts title in order to convey to a private party for economic development. Forcing the state or local agency to make a choice between accepting the land and the liability of the United States, or losing the chance for economic redevelopment of the site by declining to accept such liability, is unfair and contrary to the intent of section 120 (h) (3). Yet this is precisely the choice that will be presented in many instances, and I fear that the acute need for redevelopment and the ability to pass the liability on to the private developer will force state and local agencies to absolve the United States of liability for the harm it has caused, even though the private redeveloper's promise to accept the liability of the United States will be unfairly passed to state and local governments. "Allowing federal agencies to transfer their environmental liability to others in the name of economic development will increase the number of orphan sites of contamination when the transferee is either unwilling, or more likely unable, to fulfill the 'assurance' it gave to remediate the federal facility. Facilitating civilian redevelopment of federal facilities is a worthwhile endeavor, but not at the expense of the environment." Lenny Siegel | |
Prev by Date: ATSDR VISITS FORD ORD Next by Date: ARMY RAB POLICY | |
Prev by Thread: ATSDR VISITS FORD ORD Next by Thread: ARMY RAB POLICY |