From: | Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@igc.org> |
Date: | Sun, 23 Jun 1996 16:09:41 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | HOUSE DOWN ON DEVO |
From: Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@igc.org> HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE DOESN'T LIKE DEVOLVEMENT Previously we reported that the House Defense Appropriations Sub-Committee gave devolvement the thumbs-down. The full House Appropriations Committee apparently concurred. The sub-committee language was preserved and appears below. "In the fiscal year 1997 budget requested, the Department proposed devolving the currently centralized defense environmental restoration account (DERA) and establishing accounts for each of the military services. The committee has serious reservations about this approach. While there are standards that each service must meet in executing these accounts, the Committee believes that each service's view of its own financial exigencies will eventually influence the priorities, and the level of funding in this account. In implementating the relative risk approach, the Department of Defense has made significant advances in developing an analytic framework for assessing the funding priorities for environmental restoration. The Committee strongly supports this method for assessing funding priorities. However, the Committee does not believe that superimposing the service's agendas on an otherwise objective system will serve to benefit the Department or improve the environmental restoration program. Therefore, the Committee recommends retaining a centralized defense environmental restoration." Aimee Houghton | |
Prev by Date: WA STATE WEIGHS IN ON DEVO Next by Date: EAST BAY REPORT | |
Prev by Thread: WA STATE WEIGHS IN ON DEVO Next by Thread: EAST BAY REPORT |