From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Mon, 01 Jul 1996 15:11:52 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | MUNITIONS POLLUTION PREVENTION |
From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> MUNITIONS RANGE POLLUTION PREVENTION While the Department of Defense is generally considered a leader in industrial pollution prevention, it appears to have spent less effort minimizing the environmental impact of munitions proving and training. In conjunction with its Range Rule deliberations, however, it has issued a fact sheet on the subject: "Reducing Enviromental Impacts: Technology, Substitute Materials Developed for Active Ranges." The increasing pressure to remediate former ranges has forced the military both to initiate new pollution prevention strategies at active ranges and to document activities already underway. The fact sheet lists the following: 1. The Army Armament Research and Development Center is testing lead-free ammunition. "Lead-free training ammunition is already available for the M16 rifle and the .50 caliber machine gun." 2. The armed services are using weapons simulators in training. 3.The Army Environmental Center is evaluating various forms of bullet traps - rubber, water, metal deflector - for small arms ranges. In addition, "the Army Defense Ammunition Center and School is developing new ways to remove and recyle materials used in munitions." These include projects to process white phosphorous and to convert military explosives into commerical blasting agent. These projects deserve support, but I have yet to see any cradle-to-grave analysis of domestic munitions use that might lead to a comprehensive pollution prevention strategy - an approach that the military is using for its industrial operations. | |
Prev by Date: SMITH 120 H 3 AMENDMENT PASSES Next by Date: Conventional Disarmament & Conversion | |
Prev by Thread: SMITH 120 H 3 AMENDMENT PASSES Next by Thread: Conventional Disarmament & Conversion |