From: | PikeR@smtp.hnd.usace.army.mil |
Date: | 18 Dec 1997 15:21:34 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | IMAPCT TUNNELS |
Mr. Siegel, I am a Quality Assurance Specialist (Ammunition Surveillance) (QASAS) working with the Corps of Engineers, Ordnance and Explosives Team at the U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama, and I just returned from a Public Availability Meeting for the former Benicia Arsenal. The tunnels that you described were two earth covered concrete tunnels side by side with firing positions in front and a hillside firing butt behind. The tunnels were not dug into the sides of the hills. These tunnels were used to test 155mm Howitzer barrels using inert concrete filled projectiles. The area surrounding the tunnel area was also used for demolition/demilitarization of various rounds of ammunition so it has the potential of live ammunition. A DERP-FUDS ordnance and explosives project is underway at present; in the Removal Design phase. I hope this clarifies matters. >>> Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> 12/15/97 10:14pm >>> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit At the Benecia Arsenal, northeast of San Francisco, at least some of the munitions contamination appears to come from a type of military impact range that I haven't seen elsewhere. Artillery was fired into tunnels, dug into the sides of hills, limiting the spread of problems but conceivably increasing their concentration. Has anyone seen such a range elsewhere? Lenny Siegel Director, SFSU CAREER/PRO (and Pacific Studies Center) c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@igc.org | |
Prev by Date: cleanup funding for Philippines bases Next by Date: SHIPBREAKING | |
Prev by Thread: cleanup funding for Philippines bases Next by Thread: SHIPBREAKING |