From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Mar 1998 20:02:35 -0700 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Detroit Tank Plant Controversy |
DETROIT TANK PLANT CONTROVERSY The Army has apparently decided to "go it alone" with the cleanup of the Detroit Arsenal Tank Plant, in Warren, Michigan. In a February 13, 1998 letter, U.S. EPA's project manager for the closing facility wrote: "With the City of Warren scheduled to take title to a major portion of the surplus property in just a few weeks, it is important that the community completely understand the ramifications of the U.S. Army's decision to apply lesser standards than U.S. EPA would normally apply to the cleanup at a site of federal interest." EPA criticized the Army for preparing a Communition Relations Plan only "after many important cleanup and transfer decisions have already been made." It also pointed out that the plant was leased and occupied before the Finding of Suitability to Lease was released to the public. Furthermore, EPA said it has not seen sufficient studies to evaluate the success of the Army's selected remedy for the plant, which appears "to be institutional controls to restrict the property to commercial and industrial use. It adds, "U.S. EPA therefore questions whether the Army can provide a valid protective covenant (which is a written certification in the deed that the federal government will conduct any additional remedial action found to be necessary after the transfer.... It is not clear why the City of Warren would want to accept the parcel 'as-is' with [a] questionable covenant." EPA raised numerous specific issues that it thinks the community should comment upon, including the Army's contention that "it is not necessary for them to evaluate the human health of ecological risks from contaminated ground water" because "everyone in Warren is on a municipal water supply." EPA said that the Army also has chosen to use State of Michigan brownfields cleanup standards, "which are an order of magnitude less stringent" than federal standards. Finally, EPA complained that the Detroit Arsenal Restoration Advisory Board has met infrequently, with limited notice, within the military security perimeter on the base. We have not checked with the Army for its view of this controversy, but EPA's sharp criticism at the very least reflects a breakdown of the base closure cleanup process. Lenny Siegel Director, SFSU CAREER/PRO (and Pacific Studies Center) c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: DOE/Local Government Statement of Principles Next by Date: Aircraft Disposal Costs | |
Prev by Thread: DOE/Local Government Statement of Principles Next by Thread: Aircraft Disposal Costs |