From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Fri, 22 May 1998 17:38:34 -0700 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Buckley Field UXO Settlement |
BUCKLEY FIELD UXO SETTLEMENT The State of Colorado and the U.S. Army have reached an innovative settlement of their dispute over the appropriate response to unexploded ordnance at the former Buckley Field, east of Denver. Buckley Field, also know as the Lowry Bombing and Gunnery Range, covers about 59,000 acres in Arapahoe County. All of the property is owned by non-federal entities, including the Colorado Board of Land Commissioners, the City of Aurora, and private parties. Over three years ago, the discovery of UXO at the site led the Army Corps of Engineers, which is responsible for remediation at formerly used defense sites, to initiate an Archives Search Report. Though the Corps began field work, differences between the Army and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment emerged. In June, 1997, the Department issues an Emergency Compliance Order and filed suit in Federal court. In April, 1998, however, the two sides signed an agreement establishing a framework for cooperation while staying, but not dropping, the litigation. Both sides reserved their legal rights. * The agreement establishes a dispute resolution procedure modeled after the Defense State Memorandum of Agreement. Unresolved differences are elevated within both the state and the Army until they reach the governor and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Environmental Safety and Occupational Health. If they don't agree, then either may terminate the agreement. * The attached technical agreement specifies the use of innovative technologies recently developed by the Army Corps. The Corps, through NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, will use airborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) to survey the entire range, primarily to identify areas of concern as well as clean areas. The Corps will use digital geophysical mapping to detect and remove suspected ordnance. * The agreement specifies clearance goals and strategies for certain high profile areas, and the Corps will work with regulators and the Restoration Advisory Board to develop range clearance strategies for the remainder of UXO-contaminated parcels. * Even after the Army completes clearance or other site response activities, the Army will return to conduct additional clearance required to support changes in land use, should the landowner insist on a new use that increases risk of UXO exposure. In essence, the State is allowing portions of the property to be cleared superficially for now in exchange for the Army's promise to do conduct deeper clearance later, as needed.. Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight (AKA SFSU CAREER/PRO) c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: CORRECTION: DSB UXO REPORT ON THE WWW Next by Date: San Diego's Nuclear Megaport | |
Prev by Thread: CORRECTION: DSB UXO REPORT ON THE WWW Next by Thread: San Diego's Nuclear Megaport |