From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Sun, 14 Jun 1998 06:07:32 -0700 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | SERDP Funding Update |
SERDP FUNDING TO BE RESOLVED IN CONFERENCE COMMITTEE The House Defense Authorization bill zeroed out funding for the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), while the Senate sent it through at its fully funded level. Apparently, the House National Security Committee staff took its action, not because it had problems with the program, but because it didn't really know much about it. The difference will be resolved in conference committee. Unless members of Congress and Senators hear from their constituents that this small program is indeed important, it is likely that SERDP's final authorization will be half the requested level. Unfortunately, that means that numerous important research projects will not be supported in fiscal year 1999. As the topics of the SERDP co-sponsored Technical Symposium and Workshop show, SERDP (brochure posted separately) and its companion development/demonstration program, the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, are focusing their efforts on the same cleanup, compliance, conservation, and pollution prevention challenges that public stakeholders have recognized all across the country. A few years back, when the Pentagon undertook its strategic planning initiative for environmental research and development, I privately criticized the effort because there was no serious consultation with regulatory agencies or public stakeholders. I muted my criticism, however, when I saw the results. The Department of Defense, through SERDP, ESTCP, and the armed services, is addressing key environmental problems that are both unique to the military (such as finding unexploded ordnance) and which have broader significance (such as recovering dense non-aqueous phase liquids, or DNAPLs, such as TCE). THOUGH THERE ARE MANY "ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT" PROGRAMS WITHIN THE MILITARY, SERDP IS THE ONLY REAL SOURCE OF APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH (AS OPPOSED TO DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION) IN THE PENTAGON BUDGET. IT IS THE MAJOR SPONSOR OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH FOR UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE REMEDIATION. Perhaps, as a successful, non-controversial program, it's too "quiet." Unless it gets louder, it will get smaller. Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: Technology Symposium Next by Date: UXO related Training | |
Prev by Thread: Technology Symposium Next by Thread: UXO related Training |