From: | Ledfodan@aol.com |
Date: | 28 Aug 1998 14:53:00 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Natural Attenuation (NA) (A Modest Reply) |
Very well said Susan, especially about the reluctance for regulators to make a decision. DoD and contractors have to make the decisions and weight the benefits, pros and cons, and have to stand behind them. In a review role it is often much more comfortable to be able to identify what's wrong with an approach rather than develop the approach and be willing to put it forward, in spite of the reviews of others. This is not always a comfortable position to be in. I think everyone agrees that reviews are a critical element of our process and we must be free to express our opinons. However, there will always differing views from those who are really on the firing line and those who are not. | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Re: Natural Attenuation (NA) (A Modest Reply) Next by Date: Re: Natural Attenuation (NA) (A Modest Reply) | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Natural Attenuation (NA) (A Modest Reply) Next by Thread: Re: Natural Attenuation (NA) (A Modest Reply) |