From: | "Sam Goodhope" <Sam.Goodhope@OAG.STATE.TX.US> |
Date: | 11 Dec 1998 10:22:35 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Oral history at Military Bases |
After reviewing many documents over the years, I am not quite sure whether any of the services do a great or even good job in getting oral histories in order to comply with 120(h). Furthermore, and perhaps more importantly, it is very unclear in this era of the feds shirking their responsiblity to clean up their messes whether such activity is necessary before transfers of contaminated property to our communities occur. Hmmm, maybe that is Lenny's point..... The bottom line, after having witnessed the de facto, if not de jure dismantling of the DoD cleanup process since 1992, is that state and federal regulators need to get ready --i.e., develop the political will--to go after local government transferrees in order to protect our neighborhoods, communities, and citizens. That is not going to be easy. The problem is, obviously, I have never seen the pro-cleanup interests prevail over the booster interests when it comes time for state meta-regulatory officials to make decisions between enforcing the clenaup laws or--supposedly, I repeat, supposedly--creating jobs. (That, of course, is a false choice foisted upon us by those who polluted and do not want to pay.) Merry Christmas from Sam Grinchhope | |
Prev by Date: Nuclear Carrier Action Alert Next by Date: Mitch Moves Mines | |
Prev by Thread: Nuclear Carrier Action Alert Next by Thread: Mitch Moves Mines |