From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Fri, 4 Jun 1999 10:45:14 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Ordnance Corrosion Study |
ARMY STUDIES UXO CORROSION Increasingly, explosive compounds are being detected on military munitions ranges. Rarely, however, are the precise sources known. Are the substances there from disposal or training? Were they released through corrosion, or by low-order detonation? It turns out that very little study has been done on the fate and transport of explosive compounds in munitions. To fill this gap - in the furtherance of uninterrupted range use - the Army Environmental Center's Range XXI Program is supporting research by the Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) on the corrosion of bomb and shells. ATC researcher Joseph Bucci presented his study at the UXO [unexploded ordnance] Conference in Atlanta last week. Bucci and his colleagues are drawing upon studies of other buried metallic objects, such as culverts, and they are developing models based upon several soil variables. At this stage, they are only looking at conventional ordnance in "landlocked" soil. In landlocked soil - that is, where steel-shelled UXO is never immersed in water - corrosion is an electrochemical process that depends largely upon three, relatively easy to measure, variables: resistivity, pH, and redox potential. Under typical conditions, corrosion creates a layer of rust or calcium carbonate that protects the ordnance against additional corrosion. Bucci has concluded that there is a critical thickness, above which corrosion is not likely - under normal soil conditions - to penetrate the metal cases (skins) of UXO. Future studies, to be conducted at Aberdeen Proving Ground and other UXO sites, are being designed to determine that thickness, as a function of the three measured variables. Results of those studies could lead to the segregation of weapons impact areas by ordnance size, since smaller weapons tend to have thinner cases and are thus more likely to corrode through and leach toxic substances. Obviously, this kind of research could be broadened to determine the fate and transport of munitions compounds in a much greater variety of soils and water conditions. A comprehensive study of munitions fate and transport would prove valuable, not just for test and training ranges, but for determining ways to restore actual battlefields. As evidence of the longevity of buried munitions, Bucci points to shells from the 1916 Battle of Verdun and even cannonballs possibly deposited in the Baltimore harbor as Francis Scott Key wrote the Star Spangled Banner a century earlier. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org (PLEASE NOTE THAT WE ARE PHASING OUT MY OLD E-MAIL ADDRESS: lsiegel@igc.org) http://www.cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: Re: Meeting on Army Ammunition Plants Next by Date: Badger Army Ammunition Plant | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Meeting on Army Ammunition Plants Next by Thread: Badger Army Ammunition Plant |