From: | Laura Olah <olah@speagle.com> |
Date: | Fri, 6 Aug 1999 11:23:10 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Off-Base Sampling |
Please post. In my opinion, the issue Jeanne raises is a common concern, but "losing the farm" is extremely unlikely. The only scenario I can fathom is the rare instance when groundwater contamination from volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) is so shallow that off-gasing impacts indoor air quality, usually drawn, through negative air pressure, through basement walls and floors -- an uncommon scenario given VOCs tend to be "sinkers" when moving through the soil column. Without an identifiable source or responsible party, this would be formidable. In Wisconsin, homeowners are required to notify potential buyers of known and even suspected environmental issues that may affect property value, including private drinking water well quality. It is important to note, however, that if water is not potable, the property is only devalued the cost of replacing the well -- so "losing the farm" is not in the cards. Of course, I also realize that here in the Midwest we have the luxury of drilling a new well that is either shallower or deeper to find clean water -- if you're dealing with a sole source aquifer, then water treatment or an alternate source, like hooking up to municipal water, is the only recourse -- a financial burden, yes, but not the equivalent of losing the farm. NOT disclosing pertinent information that could affect human health is, in my opinion, a much more dependable route to financial ruin -- if the buyer finds out after sale that pertinent information was not disclosed, you can bet someone's butt will be hauled into court. Laura | |
Prev by Date: Please Post Next by Date: Regarding Vieques Declaration (of War) | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Off-Base Sampling Next by Thread: Re: Off-Base Sampling |