From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Sep 1999 10:01:30 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: BEC replacement questioned at Moffett |
[This came in from a government employee at another military base:] Civil Service regulations protect those with longevity and seniority, just as any good union shop would do. Unfortunately, most true environmental professionals haven't much seniority because the field grew up in government service in the past 10-15 years. Converted civil engineers, occupational health types, and water treatment plant operators have the points to survive reduction-in-force actions. Environmental scientists and engineers don't. In the future it will not be uncommon to see dedicated, committed, qualified environmental folks displaced by older workers from "related" specialties who must learn the processes. One possible way around the RIF is to create TERM positions -- which are civil service employment contracts for a specified period and which do not necessarily become dominoes in a RIF action. But there are minuses for the employees in that situation. This issue may be an area for dialog between the citizens, elected officials, and the government bureaucracy. I've noted that one of the big complaints in cleanup sites is the turnover in government personnel... Hope this insight is useful to you... -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: BEC replacement questioned at Moffett Next by Date: Monitoring wells | |
Prev by Thread: BEC replacement questioned at Moffett Next by Thread: Monitoring wells |