From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:35:58 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Navy FY-2000 BRAC Cleanup Shortfall |
In a recent letter to stakeholders (below), Assistant Navy Secretary Robert B. Pirie, Jr. warned that the base closure cleanup funding in the fiscal year 2000 Military Construction Appropriations Act fell well short of identified requirements, so not all planned actions will be carried out in the upcoming year. The initial cause of the shortfall was the Defense Department's ill-fated attempt to switch to "Advanced Appropriations," as described in the letter. However, once Congress rejected that concept, it had the opportunity to restore required funds, but apparently not enough members and Senators heard from their constituents that cleanup was an important issue back home. At most bases, the Navy will be able to smooth over the shortfall with good management practices IF AND ONLY IF funds are restored in the FY-2001 budget. Unless there is a popular outcry against this years cuts, I wouldn't count on full funding next year, and the already insufficient funding available for cleaning up closing bases will find a new, lower plateau. Lenny Siegel Department of the Navy The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Installations and Environment) 1000 Navy Pentagon Washington, DC 20350-1000 September 17, 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR STAKEHOLDERS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM Subj: FY-2000 CLEANUP FUNDING Funding for cleanup at installations undergoing Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) is provided from the Navy's BRAC account, which is part of the Military Construction appropriation, When the Department of the Navy developed the BRAC budget, $382 million in environmental projects was planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2000. This figure represented a $107 million real increase from FY-1999 to FY-2000 and would have funded our FY-2000 BRAC environmental requirements. During final budget deliberations with the Department of Defense, $233 million was shifted from FY-2000 to FY-2001 leaving $149 million (about 40%) available for BRAC account FY-2000. This shift of funds, called an Advanced Appropriation, was based on the premise that not all funds are needed in the year a cleanup project is initiated. After a project is initiated by awarding a contract, work progresses over many months and progress payments are made to the contractor accordingly. Only when the contractor "cashes" the government checks are funds expended from the federal treasury. Historically, the BRAC cleanup program has expended about 40% of funds in the first year, with the remaining funds expended over the following 12-18 months. Having pre-approved, future appropriations (an Advanced Appropriation) would have allowed the military services to contract for the same BRAC cleanup projects as planned in FY-2000 and have funds available for cleanup projects as they progressed into FY-2001. Congress did not approved the Advance Appropriations concept. We have been unsuccessful in restoring FY-2000 BRAC funds to the level first planned. FY-2000 will be a difficult year for Navy execution of the BRAC environmental program. Because funds have not been appropriated, we will not be able to contract for all the cleanup projects we had planned. We have asked the Naval Facilities Engineering Command and their field divisions to consult with stakeholders at BRAC bases to ensure we make the best use of available funds. The risk to human health and the status of property reuse actions will be prime factors in prioritizing our efforts. However, we are aware that not all requirements can be satisfied in FY-2000. We appreciate your understanding and cooperation as we strive to meet our regulatory obligations and commitments to your community. Sincerely, Robert B. Pirie, Jr. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: Winning the War but Losing the Environment Next by Date: ARMY HALTS HAWAII TRAINING PENDING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW | |
Prev by Thread: Winning the War but Losing the Environment Next by Thread: ARMY HALTS HAWAII TRAINING PENDING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW |