From: | vicky.peters@state.co.us |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 1999 15:06:37 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] Restriction on Fines |
I agree with the concerns voiced in this message. However, I would point out that the language is actually more detrimental than indicated in the Delahunt letter as it also precludes States from assessing penalties, and it precludes both States and EPA from assessing, not just "punitive penalties", i.e., penalties for past violations, but also "coercive penalties" which are used to "coerce" the offending party into doing the right thing, like complying with a permit or court-ordered injunction. Thus, in some respects, this language puts enforcers, state and federal alike, in a weaker position than they were in prior to the clarifications of sovereign immunity in RCRA and the Safe Drinking Water Act. We have taken a gigantic step backwards. You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. _____________________________________________________________ Got a Favorite Topic to Discuss? Start a List at Topica. http://www.topica.com/t/4 | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Tracking EOD Incidents Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Health Assessments | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Restriction on Fines Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques and Cape Cod |