From: | vozvieq@coqui.net |
Date: | Fri, 12 May 2000 10:05:49 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Report |
Mr Hoover's offer to discuss the Vieques issue in a factual, non-rhetorical ground must be engaged, even if his premise, that the only way to do this responsibly is accepting the government's position, has to be rejected. Let's get the May 4 events out of the way so we can concentrate on more substantial matters. The federal law enforcement agencies performed, to their obvious relief (after Waco and Elian), a smooth, peaceful removal of most of the protesters, just as it was planned and anticipated by all the leaders of the civil disobedience campaign. A large contingent of extremely heavily armed personnel had nothing else to do but parade their deadly weapons in front of peaceful protesters, including a considerable group of nuns, priests, and other religious leaders. Once out of the range of the cameras, however, captives were handed over to the US Navy, which behaved in a different style. Men and women of all ages were treated in spiteful ways that would shame many honorable military officers. They were exposed to a blazing sun for hours (in my case from 10:30am to 1:30pm), denied water or shade, while Navy personnel watched and filmed us from their shaded perches, sipping from ice-cold beverages. When the elder began to faint out of sunstroke and dehydration, dirty containers labeled in large letters "ABUSE FOR TEA ONLY" were passed around. People who take medication were refused access to their medicine. Women were searched repeatedly in an aggressive and shameful manner, unbuttoning their blouses in front of men, and handling their breasts, and with hands moving up their thighs and crotches. If you want independent confirmation, I'll be glad to ask Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez (D-NY) to provide it. She suffered these indignities. In the US Navy Roosevelt Roads stockade women had to urinate in plain sight, being covered only by other captives that surrounded them, because they were denied sanitary facilities. I was there. I saw it. All of us saw it. And it just convinces many of us that we are dealing with an institution that has always acted dishonorably towards Viequeans and Puerto Ricans. These are facts and reasonable conclusions that reasonable persons can arrive to from experiencing these facts. The shooting range was not completely cleared. Shamefully, the US Navy is bombing, knowing there are people in the range. Every time they claim they have fine-combed the area and certified it as empty of people, someone else pops-up and is detained. The most recent one, Magaly, told the press that she felt the bombs falling close to where she was. She confirmed there are other people in there. Now to the nitty-gritty. I'll offer a few propositions for discussion: 1) There cannot be "peaceful coexistence" between Viequeans and the US Navy. The Navy's activities in Vieques cause the destruction of large sections of the Island's ecology, and the contamination of its soils, air and waters. This contamination seeps into the food chain, and is lifted by the prevailing winds into the civilian areas. The Viequeans suffer from disproportionately higher rates of cancer and other contamination-linked diseases and abnormal conditions. 2) The US Navy has a long history --factual history, not fiction-- of behavior that can reasonably be labeled as mendacious towards Viequeans. The most recent example is their noncompliance (admitted by everyone from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Navy, and assorted Pentagon top brass) of the 1983 Memorandum of Understanding they signed to settle federal court cases brought on, separately, by the government of Puerto Rico, and by the Fishermen's Association. When it became obvious the case was turning against the Navy, they signed on to promises very similar to the ones now included in the Presidential Directives. Once the case was settled, the Navy reneged on all its written promises. There are absolutely no guarantees in the Presidential Directives that the Navy will comply if things go against it, in spite of the fact that the entire process is rigged to favor it. 3) The US Navy has tried more than once to accomplish complete ethnic cleansing of Vieques. As recent as 1962, it was very close to achieving approval of a plan that would have moved the remaining Viequeans to Culebra and St. Croix. (The plan included the removal of all dead and interred Viequeans, thus gaining the morbid nickname of "Plan Dracula".) These plans are just the tip of the iceberg. The US Navy sustains a policy of economic and demographic strangulation of the native Viequean community, cancelling all real opportunities for development through direct action. 4) With the Navy presence, Viequeans face the imminent danger of "hawaiization". Americans have been moving in, slowly but steadily, elevating the cost of the scarce land way beyond the reach of most Viequeans. The Vieques Chamber of Commerce is an American club, and local native business owners will tell you how they are invited to pay dues, but are left out of policy meetings which are conducted in small, private groups. Now the Vieques Chamber of Commerce is desperately trying to recruit native members, since the Commonwealth government, as part of the deal with the Navy, is planning to assign them part of the privilege of managing the $40 million of "infrastructure" moneys. The effort is aimed at blunting the inevitable denunciation of discrimination and favoritism. So it can be reasonably stated that the struggle of the native Viequean people is a life and death struggle for a hard pressed community. Contamination kills. Economic limitations erode the native population through emigration, and ethnic substitution is going on by well to do Americans moving in with money and getting economic control of the Island, and ownership of the land. We are not the first native population to suffer this luck. Native Americans underwent a terrible ordeal. Hawaiian natives saw how they became tourist attractions --folklore items for the American tourist industry-- in their own homeland. And it is not the first time otherwise decent Americans refuse to see and admit they are agents of disruption and dissolution of living communities in Vieques and many other places. Only that in Vieques they --both the US Navy and the Americans who cheer them on-- will have to deal with a persistent and increasingly militant native population that will defend its right to survive as a healthy, peaceful community. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to: cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] "Cry me a River" Esq., style. Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] CARIBBEAN WHALE STRANDINGS LINKED TO NAVY ACTIVITIES | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Report Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Report |