From: | marylia@earthlink.net |
Date: | Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:36:55 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] DOE misses NIF deadline |
Hi peace and enviro advocates: I thought you might be interested in an article detailing DOE's missing the congressionally-mandated deadline to "rebaseline" the cost of the National Ignition Facility. By June 1, 2000, the Department was suppossed to have provided Congress with either the price tag for the problem-plagued mega-laser or with the estimated costs to close out the project, according to last year's House and Senate Conference Committee Report. On June 1, DOE did neither, sending instead a request for a three month extension. This article is from the Tri-Valley Herald, the story was covered in the San Francisco Chronicle and other papers as well. Read on... LIVERMORE LAB MISSES DEADLINE CONGRESS THREATENS TO DISMANTLE HIGHLY TROUBLED LASER PROJECT Tri-Valley Herald -- Friday, June 2, 2000 by Glenn Roberts Jr. LIVERMORE -- Energy Department officials asked Congress on Thursday for a three-month extension to complete a report on the revised cost and schedule of a troubled laser project at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. Members of Congress had requested the report by Thursday under threat that the National Ignition Facility laser project under construction at Livermore Lab would otherwise be dismantled. Air Force Brig. Gen. Thomas Gioconda, acting assistant secretary for Energy Department defense programs, said Thursday that the Energy Department has instead submitted preliminary estimates to Congress for the National Ignition Facility project. "We are requesting more time from Congress to make sure we go through a detailed review," Gioconda said. "We have not completed a bottoms-up review." A final report will be submitted to Congress in mid-September. Gioconda said he is hopeful that Congress will be patient. "I'm hoping that they evaluate the path forward and accept that path forward." U.S. Rep. Ellen Tauscher, a Democrat who lives in Alamo, said Thursday through a spokesman that she has not had time to review the preliminary report, which was released late in the day. The preliminary report was submitted to congressional committees with oversight of Energy Department appropriations, he said. A stadium-size nuclear weapons research tool, NIF was designed to blast BB-size pellets of radioactive fuel with 192 high-power X-ray laser beams. NIF construction began in 1997. According to the preliminary estimates, NIF has almost doubled in cost -- to $2.1 billion -- and is about six years behind schedule. And considering all NIF-related research and development, coupled with the project cost, the total price tag is estimated at $3.3 billion. In the approaching budget year, Livermore Lab is expected to cut other programs by about $63 million to help pay for NIF cost overruns and about $32 million will be taken from other Energy Department facilities. Gioconda said it is not yet certain where the rest of the estimated $1 billion cost increase will be taken from, though Energy Secretary Bill Richardson has said that costs would be at the expense of other programs within the Energy Department, at no added cost to taxpayers. NIF problems surfaced last year, when lab and Energy Department officials initially estimated that NIF was about $350 million over budget and 12 to 18 months behind schedule. Richardson reprimanded Livermore Lab officials in August 1999 for withholding information about the project troubles. In September 1999, a congressional committee asked Richardson to "complete and certify a new cost and schedule" by June 1. "If the secretary is unable to provide such a certification, the Department should prepare an estimate of the costs necessary to terminate the project." Susan Houghton, a Livermore Lab spokeswoman, said the lab is working to prepare a revised cost and schedule for NIF based on the Energy Department's decision in May on how to proceed with the project. "We're just starting (that process)," Houghton said. Marylia Kelley, executive director for Tri-Valley Communities Against a Radioactive Environment, an anti-nuclear group based in Livermore, said she expects that the lateness of the final cost and schedule report will erode congressional confidence in the project. She said the delayed report also will allow the lab to continue to spend millions on NIF and increase the overall investment in the project, which will make it more difficult for Congress to say "no" on NIF. NIF may "eat other programs alive" at Livermore and other labs if it continues, said Kelley, a longtime lab critic. Marylia Kelley Tri-Valley CAREs (Communities Against a Radioactive Environment) 2582 Old First Street Livermore, CA USA 94550 <http://www.igc.org/tvc/> - is our web site, please visit us there! (925) 443-7148 - is our phone (925) 443-0177 - is our fax Working for peace, justice and a healthy environment since 1983, Tri-Valley CAREs has been a member of the nation-wide Alliance for Nuclear Accountability in the U.S. since 1989, and is a co-founding member of the Abolition 2000 global network for the elimination of nuclear weapons, the U.S. Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Back From the Brink campaign to get nuclear weapons taken off hair-trigger alert. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to: cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Army Agrees to Improve Wastewater Procedures at Fort Lewis Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] dursban, epa may relax clean air rules, free gis | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Army Agrees to Improve Wastewater Procedures at Fort Lewis Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] dursban, epa may relax clean air rules, free gis |