From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:43:39 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Wonderful (?) World of Oz |
[This was posted to the list by Katherine Hopkins, katiehopkins@earthlink.net] I originally sent this letter on Friday, 10/13/00. I did not include my name, address and phone numbers. If you print my letter, please state that I am from DeSoto, Kansas. I live in an unincorporated area of the county, .5 mile directly east of the Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant. I want people to realize that I live in very close proximity to the plant. Thank you. Where were the elected officials at the GSA forum (Wednesday, 10/11/00 at 7:00 p.m. at DeSoto High School, DeSoto, Kansas) on Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966? Did anyone know about it? This was a forum regarding "The Act that REQUIRES Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties and afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment". Where was Dr. Powers, the head of the State Historic Preservation Officer? Where has Dr. Powers been throughout this whole process? Is there really a Dr. Powers? Is there really a State Historic Preservation Office or is it just a figment of someone's imagination? I'm beginning to wonder if there was even a National Historic Preservation Act of 1966? The GSA certainly can't convince me! In the "Regulations Flow Chart" which was distributed by the GSA prior to the forum, step 1 (It is at the top of the flowchart which I interpret as being step 1), it states "Initiate Section 106 Process, Establish undertaking, Identify appropriate SHPO/THPO Plan to involve the public, Identify other consulting parties". If that is step 1, then why are they just holding a public forum on Section 106? If that is Step 1, then why would the Johnson County Commissioners already be scheduling a vote on a possible transfer? How stupid does the GSA think we are? The only reason they had the forum is because TOTO has filed a lawsuit to make them fulfill their legal obligations to the citizens of this country. That's why! Does this sound like angry rhetoric? I only try to be an expert at "using language effectively and persuasively". Another definition of rhetoric is "language that is elaborate, pretentious, insincere, or intellectually vacuous". That to me is a perfect description of the what the GSA has been saying for the last 2 years. I'm not an expert, but weren't the results of these historic studies supposed to be included in the Environmental Assessment? That's right--they couldn't have been. The Environmental Assessment was issued 12/23/99. The public forum was just held on October 11, 2000! I find it very hard to believe (Let's face it-I was not convinced-even in the slightest!) that the GSA's attempts to identify historic properties has been on-going for several years as stated by Mark Duffy, a GSA lawyer. Rather, I believe that the attempt to ignore their obligation to identify historic properties has been on-going for several years. A recent political advertisement for a candidate for office in Kansas made a statement to the effect that you have to speak up and not be afraid to stand for principal to restore honesty and integrity in government. Well now is the perfect opportunity and I don't hear too many elected officials uttering a word about the transfer of this land and how it is being handled. Votes were cast on legislation pertaining to the transfer of this project prior to public forums being completed. The legislation pertained to the Oz Entertainment Company and as we all know, they lobbied hard for it. And this hasn't been a joint effort from the very beginning? The GSA isn't sleeping with Oz? Who are they trying to fool? This project should never have been brought to this table. It shouldn't even be on the list of the ingredients. But here it is--the entree! Well, this is one entree that is overdone, tough indigestible, totally unpalatable!! But please--don't throw it to the Dogs. I don't think TOTO has the stomach for it either! One more comment. This has been a project based upon deceipt from Day 1! Is anyone getting the picture? It's time for everyone (pro or con) to let the Johnson County Commissioners (if they will listen) know how they feel. Send your letter to: County Commissioners Office of the Board of County Commissioners 111 South Cherry, Suite 3200 Olathe, Kansas 66061 Remind them that if they don't hear you now, they might hear you in the voting booth! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to: cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Anti-Armor Weapons Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Mustard Bomb Site Cleanup Sickened Workers | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Anti-Armor Weapons Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Mustard Bomb Site Cleanup Sickened Workers |