2001 CPEO Military List Archive

From: CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org>
Date: 9 Jan 2001 00:47:33 -0000
Reply: cpeo-military
Subject: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Response to "Environmentally sensitive warmaking"
 
Original message from Fenoy W. Butler <fenoy@olg.com>

Please Reply to: <fenoy@olg.com> and/or <cpeo-military@igc.topica.com>


Mr. Hugus:

It is certainly not obvious to me that "in the deepest sense, the Pentagon
is conducting a war on the biosphere." I was under the impression that DOD
was and is, in the deepest sense, protecting us from the enemies of the
United States.

I would be curious to hear what you would consider to be an environmentally
acceptable methods for "killing" an enemy tank or stopping an infantry
division. Obviously, to be environmentally acceptable, these methods could
not employ propellants, high explosives, or depleted uranium. What would
you suggest DOD employ - harsh words perhaps?

Remember - it is easy to take liberty for granted, when you have never had
it taken from you.

Fenoy Butler

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Follow-Ups
  Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Combat and the environment
Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Response to "Environmentally sensitive warmaking"
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Response to "Environmentally sensitive warmaking"
Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Response to "Environmentally sensitive warmaking"

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index