From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 30 Jan 2001 18:32:50 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Alternative to rocket propellant burning |
Last year, when I attended one of the hearings about the proposed continuation of open burning and open detonation at the Sierra Army Depot, I noted that much of the Depot's waste solid rocket fuel burning, conducted a few years back, occurred because activists had chased the activity out of my county, Santa Clara. I also remembered that a small number of activists nationwide had supported the Pentagon's efforts to develop alternatives to open burning as a disposal method for large solid rocket motor fuel. I knew some pilot plants had been built, but I had lost track of the state of the emerging technologies. Last week a permit modification proposal crossed my desk, filling in some of the blanks. United Technologies Corporation's Chemical Systems Division facility in San Jose, the plant which had been targeted by activists because it formerly conducted open burning wholesale, has apparently been using an on-site Hydrolysis Treatment Facility since 1997. Located at the intersection of Oxidizer Road and Mixer Road (honest!), more than a half-mile within the UTC property, the facility is capable of treating up to 200 pounds of either major formulation (1.1 or 1.3) of solid rocket propellant per day. The propellant is production waste generated during on-site manufacturing and research operations. In the treatment facility, water and sodium hydroxide are added to the propellant. Aluminum, one of the principal components of solid rocket fuel, reacts to form aluminum hydroxide and hydrogen. Ammonium perchlorate, the other principal component, reacts to form sodium perchlorate and ammonia. The products are not ignitable, but they still may require further treatment or disposal as hazardous waste. Emissions of ammonia, hydrogen, and nitrogen oxides are monitored, and they may be subject to emission control. The permit modification request makes it clear that the company thinks it can make the process more efficient, but it appears that hydrolysis, as a method for demilitarizing solid rocket fuel, is a major step forward. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Fw: Nuclear doctor found 62% of sick Gulf War vets had uranium presen Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Lewis range clearance | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Fw: Nuclear doctor found 62% of sick Gulf War vets had uranium presen Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Lewis range clearance |