From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 5 Apr 2001 20:10:08 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Lowry AFB Privatization |
from Anne Callison <Awbarbour@aol.com> It has been revealed during the process of considering the proposed privatization of the cleanup of the former Lowry AFB that the contractor, Cherokee Environmental Risk Management, which was selected by the Lowry Redevelopment Authority (LRA), figures that since the former base will no longer be a "BRAC" base, then DOD policy regarding RABs no longer applies. The LRA has made it very clear that they want to shut the Lowry RAB out of the "input" process once they get a Cooperative Agreement signed with the AF. The AF has made it clear the RAB will stay involved. This will be particularly important as Cherokee is touting the fact that "if one technology doesn't work, we'll just switch to another." One, I think they are ignoring the realities of the AF having to review all technologies, two, that the regulators will have to review all technologies, and three, the public is not going to stand for Cherokee and the LRA using any technology they choose. Does anyone have any thoughts on whether privatization means a base is no longer a BRAC site and under DOD guidance? Were the RABs done away with in the privatization schemes now in effect at other former BRAC sites? Anne Callison, community co-chair, Lowry AFB RAB ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Summary of Air Force "Encroachment" Testimony Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Summary of Army "Encroachment" Testimony | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Summary of Air Force "Encroachment" Testimony Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Summary of Army "Encroachment" Testimony |