From: | Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 26 Apr 2001 20:31:10 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Blumenhauer Addresses House on UXO |
Special Order on Earth Day [The following are comments (known as Special Order) made by Rep. Blumenhauer in the House of Representatives. --Aimee] U.S. House of Representatives April 24, 2001 Mr. BLUMENAUER. I thank the gentleman, Madam Speaker. I was particularly taken by a comment the gentleman made about the opportunities to build the environment, to create jobs, to build the economy; that these are things that can be done concurrently and actually add value, being able to help make our families safe, healthy, and economically secure. I had an opportunity this last week to tour a location where actually what the gentleman is talking about could have a tremendous effect. In the metropolitan Portland area, across the river, it is not in my district or in my State but it is a very short journey, there is a large formerly-used defense facility called Camp Bonneville, 3,800 acres that has been used for the better part of this last century for military purposes. The community has a plan where they would like to take this area that has been off limits, that has not been subjected to development. It has a potential for wildlife, for recreation, that is almost unsurpassed, just a few minutes from the core of a major metropolitan area, but it is going to require that the Department of Defense step up and provide the resources to decontaminate the area. We do not know what is on the 3,800 acres. There is not money budgeted, although we recently had a reversal of a decision by the Department of Defense to go in and help us with that survey. It is critical that we examine areas like this. When they first went in, there were 105-millimeter shells on the ground that they could find. These are items of high explosives, 7 1/2 pounds of blasting powder, that could do tremendous damage. Now we have an opportunity perhaps, if the Department of Defense, the Corps of Engineers, and this Congress steps forward, to be able to make a difference for the people in the metropolitan area of Portland-Vancouver-Washington. But it is an example of what we can do to balance the environment, provide jobs, and give back precious resources in terms of open space and redevelopment possibilities. But while we were on recess this last week, there was finally the long-awaited report from the General Accounting Office that deals with the environmental liabilities of just training range cleanup costs. The report was rather startling. It indicated that while the Department of Defense thought that its liability for the cleanup of training ranges was about $14 billion, they find that other estimates show that liability could well exceed $100 billion just for training range cleanup. Without complete and accurate data, it is impossible to determine whether these amounts represent a reasonable estimate, or what the implications are. We have not performed a complete inventory of the ranges, identifying the types and extent of the unexploded ordnance and the associated contamination. We have a long list of areas that are formerly-used defense sites, training sites, base closures. We do not have the top management focus and leadership necessary even to get reliable report estimates at this point, and sadly, there is no specific program for unexploded ordnance remediation policy, goals, or program. Now, we have been writing as Members of Congress, bringing this to the attention of the appropriators, to our fellow Members of Congress. This is a situation that affects not just metropolitan Portland, but it is something that touches people all across the country. Two weeks ago, the gentlewoman from the District of Columbia (Ms. NORTON) and I led a trip to the American University campus and Spring Valley residential development here in the District of Columbia, where they are still excavating the hillside, removing arsenic. There is a child care center on the campus of American University that was closed because of intolerably high arsenic levels. In our Nation's Capitol, from coast-to-coast, border to border, we have over 1,000 of these sites that need to be addressed that represent a threat to the public safety and health, and if done properly, represent an opportunity to have a transformational effect on communities in terms of the economic activities associated with cleanup and then the reuse of these facilities. (intervening dialogue with Rep. Pallone) Mr. BLUMENAUER. Madam Speaker, I appreciate the gentleman's somber reflections because we need to look at this in a balanced and objective fashion. I would just conclude my remarks this evening on a note of optimism and hoping that we will be able to work in a bipartisan fashion to do something about having the Federal Government step up and lead by example. The United States Government is the largest Superfund polluter in the United States, the government itself. The military waste, the toxics and explosives that we have littering the landscape constitute a battle right here on American soil 26 years after the Vietnam war, 56 years after the conclusion of World War II, 83 years after World War I. It involves mines and nerve gases and toxics and explosive shells. It has claimed at least 65 lives that we know of, most of them since World War II. There is a strong likelihood, I am told, that there are more people who have lost their lives that we just as yet do not know about, and there are many more who have been maimed and injured. What, I guess, shocked me the most were two young boys who were killed as a result of an explosive shell that they found in a field in a subdivision in their hometown of San Diego that was a formerly used military defense site. Three boys found the shell. They were playing with it. They detonated it, and two of them were killed. This danger continues every day. If we are not careful, at the rate we are going, it could last for another 500 or 1,000 years. Now, this toxic waste of military activities in the United States could potentially contaminate 20 to 25 million acres, and some estimates are as high as 50 million acres. As I pointed out, we do not have a good inventory. We do not know. But what we do know is, at the current rate of spending in a budget that is not yet adequate, it will take centuries, potentially 1,000 years or more to return the land to safe and productive use and to protect children who may be playing, or wildlife. Fire fighters in the forests who were a couple of summers ago in a forest fire in New York State, all of a sudden they were out in the forest, and there were huge explosions because buried shells from artillery practice that did not explode were suddenly being detonated by the forest fire. Congress needs to report for duty. It needs to provide the administrative and financial tools that are necessary. What I am talking about here is not going to affect active ranges and readiness. My concern is for closed, transferred, and transferring ranges where the public is already exposed or soon will be. I hope that we can make every Member of Congress, every aspect of the Department of Defense, the Corps of Engineers understand what is going on in each and every one of our States, because every State is at risk. We can make sure that somebody is in charge, that there is enough funding, and that we get the job done so that no child will be at risk of death, dismemberment or serious illness as a result of the United States Government not cleaning up after itself. In the course of our conversation this evening, we have talked about some positive elements and some that were perhaps a little disconcerting, but I think this is an area that we can commit ourselves to working in a bipartisan way. I can think of no more positive aspect for claiming the true purpose and spirit of Earth Day than acting to make sure that the Federal Government is doing all it can in this important area. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Aimee R.
Houghton
Associate Director, CPEO
122 C Street NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001-2109
tel: 202-662-1888; fax: 202-628-1825
Email: aimeeh@cpeo.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Colorado LUC legislation link Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] NIF-DC NGO Roundtable - Invitation | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Colorado LUC legislation link Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] NIF-DC NGO Roundtable - Invitation |