From: | petestrauss1@home.com |
Date: | 31 Jul 2001 20:35:42 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Irvine Desalter/TCE remediation project |
The issue at El Toro raises a larger issue for almost all cleanups in California and perhaps elsewhere. In CA, the State Water Resources Control Board has generally required cleanup of all "potential drinking water sources". "Potential" is defined by two parameters: one that you can pump at least 200 gallons per day and the second is that TDS levels are no greater than 3,000 mg/L. If TDS levels are being cleaned up at El Toro along with TCE, as Lenny's e-mail suggests, than it makes sense to not use the TDS parameter for all situations. In fact, at three sites where I am working, regulators have written off groundwater sources with greater than 3,000 mg/L - meaning they did not have to clean up contaminants polluting these waters. So I have an open question: should these groundwater sources be reconsidered as potential drinking water sources, even though they do not meet the TDS limits? Another way of looking at this is to disregard the state's definition and look at the practical approaches for potential use and cost of removing TDS. Peter Strauss ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Irvine Desalter/TCE remediation project Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Irvine Desalter/TCE remediation project | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Irvine Desalter/TCE remediation project Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Irvine Desalter/TCE remediation project |