From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 1 Aug 2001 05:40:14 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Response to Air Force's Marilyn Null |
>From Marilyn Null <NullM@pentagon.af.mil> In response to Joel Feigenbaum: Those who know me know that I have a great deal of respect for community activists and the part they play in getting and keeping the government's attention on issues affecting their communities. The activists at MMR, indeed, have played a large role in keeping the community-based decision making process alive and well at the installation. I said that the process being used in the Installation Restoration Program at MMR is a model for community-based decision making because I believe it is true. I didn't say it was easy and without controversy, or that we always agree. The point is that community-based decision making requires opportunities for discussion and debate on the issues from all viewpoints. This is the process that the Air Force, EPA, DEP, and the citizens of Cape Cod have built for the cleanup program at MMR over the past few years, allowing the cleanup to proceed and involving stakeholders every step of the way. The process has emerged through hard work and dedicated efforts of the activists and other citizens of Cape Cod, local officials, staff and management in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, EPA Region 1, and, yes, the Air Force and the Department of Defense. Joel has clearly outlined the events leading up to the "gridlock" situation resulting from the failure of the 60% design. As one Air Force officer pointed out during those tumultuous times, the 60% design failed because it did not take into consideration all of the criteria necessary to provide a balanced solution to the problem. The Decision Criteria Matrix (DCM) tool I mentioned, and that is posted on the MMR web site, was developed in the 1996-97 timeframe, after the failure of the 60% design. Using this tool, the Air Force, EPA, DEP, the Joint Process Action Team (which included members of the Plume Containment Team), local officials, and the community-at-large developed and refined solutions that included input from as many stakeholders as we could engage. This is the essence of a community-based process. The stakeholder involvement process at MMR allows us to collectively reach decisions and move the cleanup program forward, meeting enforceable milestones with the regulators, and getting systems in place to meet the expectations of the community. It hasn't always been easy, it hasn't always been without controversy, and it hasn't always satisfied every stakeholder in the process. That's how democracy works and I, for one, embrace it! mn Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs SAF/MIQ 1660 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC 20330-1660 703-693-7705, DSN 223 FAX: 703-614-2884 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] HASC May Try to Reverse Exisitng Language on Vieques Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Summary of Spring Valley Hearing | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] (reformat) Response to Air Force's Marilyn Null Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Bay Area Environmental Technology Summit - July 31st |